2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00023-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working memory and intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
43
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gf-WM correlations are generally higher when the relations are examined at the level of factor scores, composite scores, or latent variables. To illustrate, correlations ranging from .59 to .89 have been reported in studies by Ackerman, Beier and Boyle (2002), Colom, Abad, Rebollo and Shih (2005), Colom, Flores-Mendoza and Rebollo (2003), Colom, Rebollo, Palacios, Juan-Espinosa and Kyllonen (2004), Colom and Shih (2004), Conway, et al (2002), Conway, Kane and Engle (2003), Kyllonen and Christal (1990), Suss, Oberaurer, Wittmann, Wilhelm and Schulze (2002), , and Wilhelm and Oberaurer (2006), and reported a median correlation of .72 across 14 different data sets.…”
Section: Results Inmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The Gf-WM correlations are generally higher when the relations are examined at the level of factor scores, composite scores, or latent variables. To illustrate, correlations ranging from .59 to .89 have been reported in studies by Ackerman, Beier and Boyle (2002), Colom, Abad, Rebollo and Shih (2005), Colom, Flores-Mendoza and Rebollo (2003), Colom, Rebollo, Palacios, Juan-Espinosa and Kyllonen (2004), Colom and Shih (2004), Conway, et al (2002), Conway, Kane and Engle (2003), Kyllonen and Christal (1990), Suss, Oberaurer, Wittmann, Wilhelm and Schulze (2002), , and Wilhelm and Oberaurer (2006), and reported a median correlation of .72 across 14 different data sets.…”
Section: Results Inmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In Colom, Flores-Mendoza, and Rebollo's (2003) study on the relationship between WM and intelligence, the intelligence tests they used were Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (Centro editor de psicologia aplicada, 1993), and the Letter Series test from the Primary Mental Abilities Test (Thurstone, 1938), which asks participants to choose a letter among several letters based on some inductive relationships among them. WM was assessed with simple letter span and digit span tasks, as well as tasks used in Kyllonen and Christal's (1990) study.…”
Section: Wm and Fluid Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bulk of data from the literature captured in the present review strongly suggested that working memory and intelligence were neither isomorphic nor identical constructs (Ackerman et al, 2005;Kane et al, 2005;Oberauer et al, 2005), although it was quite clear that both of these constructs were highly related to one another (Colom et al, 2003;Kyllonen & Christal, 1990). The high correlation was postulated to be based on shared fundamental neural mechanisms in the dorsolateral prefrontal regions in the brain (Conway et al, 2003;Kane & Engle, 2002;Klingberg, 2010) and basic mental processes such as short-term memory storage (Colom et al, 2008) and processing speed (Fry & Hale, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Since then, there have been various publications in the literature to identify the link between WM and g. Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005) conducted a meta-analysis of 86 such studies that related WM and g and concluded that the average correlation between the two constructs was 0.48 -that they only shared about 25% common variance. Studies included in the meta-analysis reported correlation between performance on WM tasks and measures of g that ranged from 0.50 to 0.90 (Colom, Flores-Mendoza, & Rebollo, 2003;Fry & Hale, 1996;Jurden, 1995;Salthouse, Mitchell, Skovronek, & Babcock, 1989;Stauffer, Ree, & Carretta, 1996;Tucker & Warr, 1996;Verguts & De Boeck, 2001). However, their conclusion did not reflect the bulk of contemporary view of the relationship between WM and g and the data that supported the correlation.…”
Section: Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%