2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2015.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workflow performance improvement using model-based scheduling over multiple clusters and clouds

Abstract: Please cite this article as: K. Maheshwari, E.-S. Jung, J. Meng, V. Morozov, V. Vishwanath, R. Kettimuthu, Workflow performance improvement using model-based scheduling over multiple clusters and clouds, Future Generation Computer Systems (2015), http://dx. AbstractIn recent years, a variety of computational sites and resources have emerged, and users often have access to multiple resources that are distributed. These sites are heterogeneous in nature and performance of different tasks in a workflow varies fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Makespan is referred to be the time length from the time that workflow execution starts to the time when its execution is finished. Many algorithms are proposed for the makespan minimization . Deadline is a common constraint combined with cost minimization of the workflow execution, which is the maximum makespan accepted by users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Makespan is referred to be the time length from the time that workflow execution starts to the time when its execution is finished. Many algorithms are proposed for the makespan minimization . Deadline is a common constraint combined with cost minimization of the workflow execution, which is the maximum makespan accepted by users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many algorithms are proposed for the makespan minimization. 11,18 Deadline is a common constraint combined with cost minimization of the workflow execution, 19,20 which is the maximum makespan accepted by users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same approach is adopted by [37] and [101]. Regarding the execution of large-scale applications on similar scale systems, [68] suggest a multi-site workflow scheduling technique to enhance the range of available resources to execute workflows. While their approach does consider data transfers and the costs of sending data over expensive (slower) links that connect different geographically distributed sites, their approach does not consider 1) performance fluctuations during execution of the workflow, which would suggest the implementation of rescheduling and rebalancing mechanisms; 2) reliability mechanisms to cope with performance fluctuations due to failures; and 3) the influence of contention in the general I/O operations, such as sequential accesses to the same data inputs.…”
Section: Hybrid and Multicloud Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work mainly concentrated on energy alone and need to calculate monetary cost connected with the use of VMs and profits for service providers. Maheshwari et al [19] presented performance models used multi-site workflow scheduling technique to calculate execution time on resources and active probes to categorize the attainable network throughput connecting sites without considering optimization parameters. Arabnejad et al [20] presented a heuristic scheduling algorithm considering quadratic time complexity including the two constraints time and cost but they failed to give importance to the runtime environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%