2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worker safety and injury severity analysis of earthmoving equipment accidents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some studies that focused on other specific accident types in addition to fall accidents. Accidents due to electricity (Suárez-Cebador et al, 2014), and earthmoving equipment-related incidents were also investigated (Kazan & Usmen, 2018). Suárez-Cebador et al (2014) investigated electricity accidents in terms of the 13 different attributes whose significance levels were lower than 0.05.…”
Section: Studies For Specific Accident Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some studies that focused on other specific accident types in addition to fall accidents. Accidents due to electricity (Suárez-Cebador et al, 2014), and earthmoving equipment-related incidents were also investigated (Kazan & Usmen, 2018). Suárez-Cebador et al (2014) investigated electricity accidents in terms of the 13 different attributes whose significance levels were lower than 0.05.…”
Section: Studies For Specific Accident Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Univariate analysis is usually the first analysis used by researchers who perform statistical analysis in different study fields and on various databases 33 , 34 ) . The main objectives of the analysis are to explain the data and tell the researcher what is available 35 ) . In this research, 12 variables were created by their sub-categories using the OSHA classifications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After finding the p -value, researchers can decide whether the result is meaningful or not (commonly taken as 0.05). For this reason, the cases where the value of p is less than 0.05 are considered to be significant, the hypothesis H 0 is rejected and it is assumed that there is a relation between the variables 35 ) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-test Opinion survey [2], Impact Measurement Centre [3], McCann [4], Tamkin et al [5] and Wang and Wilcox [6]. As discussed by Tamkin et al [5], Donald Kirkpatrick offers a model for training effectiveness evaluation, which refers to four levels of assessment: Level 1 assessment is the reaction of the trainee to the perceived usefulness of the training received.…”
Section: Sign Upmentioning
confidence: 99%