2020
DOI: 10.1108/md-08-2019-1035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workaholism and workplace incivility: the role of work–family enrichment

Abstract: PurposeThis paper investigated the relationships among workaholism, work–family enrichment (work–life enrichment), and workplace incivility.Design/methodology/approachData on workaholism, incivility, and work–family enrichment were collected through the administration of a survey on 414 employees of a public bank in Iran.FindingsWorkaholism and life–work enrichment were positively and negatively related to uncivil behaviors, respectively, and workaholism was positively associated with work–family enrichment. O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bidirectionality of work-family enrichment. Unlike earlier studies such as Greenhaus and Powell (2006), recent work such as Hill et al (2020), Taheri et al (2020), Kalliath et al (2020) and Premchandran and Priyadarshi (2020) are beginning to focus on the positive relationships between work and family. WFE can be explained as the "extent to which experiences of how family roles benefit from work roles through developmental resources, positive affect, and psychosocial capital derived from involvement in work" (Greenhaus and Powell, 2006;Siu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Bidirectionality of work-family enrichment. Unlike earlier studies such as Greenhaus and Powell (2006), recent work such as Hill et al (2020), Taheri et al (2020), Kalliath et al (2020) and Premchandran and Priyadarshi (2020) are beginning to focus on the positive relationships between work and family. WFE can be explained as the "extent to which experiences of how family roles benefit from work roles through developmental resources, positive affect, and psychosocial capital derived from involvement in work" (Greenhaus and Powell, 2006;Siu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the partial least squares – multigroup analysis (PLS-MGA) approach, we address the second gap by examining how gender influences the bidirectional relationship between WFC and WFE on JS and FS. This study would complement existing works such as Rhee et al (2020), Hill et al (2020) and Taheri et al (2020) leveraging a person-centered lens to explore the effect of these variables for different people. Therefore, rather than examining conflict or enrichment separately, person-centered methods detect profiles that differ qualitatively or quantitatively in a combination of variables, offering novel insight (Vaziri et al , 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Work connectivity behavior after-hours gives employees more autonomy and control, makes it possible for them to integrate multiple different role tasks, and helps them balance the needs of work and family ( Boswell and Olson-Buchanan, 2007 ). WCBA not only helps to reduce the information exchange and meeting pressure perceived by employees ( Fonner and Roloff, 2010 ), improving their communication efficiency, but also helps them to quickly respond to the work needs of organizations and colleagues to enhance their own status, obtaining more work resources for work–family enrichment and positive work behavior ( Taheri et al, 2020 ), which is conducive to the generation of thriving at work ( Luthans and Youssef, 2004 ; Bloom et al, 2011 ). Also, WCBA can enhance an employee’s sense of autonomy and control over role switching, alleviate the role conflict between taking on work tasks and caring for the family, help to improve the employee’s work–family balance, and promote thriving at family ( Chou and Cheung, 2013 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%