Work stress prevention needs of employees and supervisors

Abstract

BackgroundWork stress prevention can reduce health risks for individuals, as well as organisational and societal costs. The success of work stress interventions depends on proper implementation. Failure to take into account the needs of employees and supervisors can hinder intervention implementation. This study aimed to explore employee and supervisor needs regarding organisational work stress prevention.MethodsSemi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with employees (n = 7) and supervisors (n = 8) from different sectors, such as the finance, health care, and services industry. The interviews focused on respondents’ needs regarding the prevention of work stress within an organisational setting. Performing thematic analysis, topics and themes were extracted from the verbatim transcribed interviews using Atlas.ti.ResultsBoth employees and supervisors reported a need for: 1) communication about work stress, 2) attention for determinants of work stress, 3) supportive circumstances (prerequisites) for work stress prevention, 4) involvement of various stakeholders in work stress prevention, and 5) availability of work stress prevention measures. Both employees and supervisors expressed the need for supervisors to communicate about work stress. Employees and supervisors reported similar psychosocial work factors that should be targeted for prevention (e.g., social support and autonomy). There was greater variety in the sub-themes within communication about work stress and supportive circumstances for work stress prevention in supervisor responses, and greater variety in the sub-themes within availability of work stress prevention measures in employee responses.ConclusionsBoth employees and supervisors were explicit about who should take part in communication about work stress, what prerequisites for work stress prevention should exist, and which stakeholders should be involved. These results can inform work stress prevention practice, supporting selection and implementation of interventions.Trial registrationThis study was registered in the Netherlands National Trial Register, trial code: NTR5527.

The association between effective workplace communication with superiors and lower psychological distress among workers in the evacuation area after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident

“…According to previous studies, frequent and interpersonal communication in a workplace or well‐managed workplace communication could promote well‐mental health status among workers . Conversely, lack of workplace communication was significantly associated with high‐psychological distress and was a related factor for mental health problems after the Great East Japan earthquake .…”

“…According to several studies, an optimal environment for workplace communication involving frequent and interpersonal communication or well‐managed workplace communication could consequently promote well‐mental health status among workers under regular work conditions . Conversely, the opposite could happen, for example, the lack of workplace communication among local welfare workers after the Great East Japan earthquake was significantly associated with high‐psychological distress .…”

Process Evaluation of a Participative Organizational Intervention as a Stress Preventive Intervention for Employees in Swedish Primary Health Care

“…Moreover, a study of stress prevention needs of employees and supervisors [ 49 ] shows that both employees and supervisors indicate the need for more attention for job demands, and that job demands often depended on factors beyond supervisors control such as personnel shortage (or politically made decisions as described above). In other words, another explanation for the small effects on stress could be theory failure—i.e., improving only resources may not be enough.…”

Decreasing employees’ work stress by a participatory, organizational level work stress prevention approach: a multiple-case study in primary education

“…For these reasons, the participatory approach has been broadly advocated as an effective strategy in organizational interventions to improve occupational health [34]. Another important implementation factor mentioned in previous research is clear and transparent communication [39,[41][42][43]. Communication about and throughout the process is very important to get and keep employees informed and involved.…”