2007
DOI: 10.1086/510785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work Schedule, Needle Use, and Needlestick Injuries Among Registered Nurses

Abstract: Despite advances in protecting workers from needlestick injuries, extended work schedules and their concomitant physical demands are still contributing to the occurrence of injuries and illnesses to nurses. Such working conditions, if modified, could lead to further reductions in needlestick injuries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
124
1
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
11
124
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement Trinkoff, Brown & Lipscomb, 2007 in her study in United States described that long working hours, working off-shifts and working on week-ends contributes significantly to NSIs and other injuries and illnesses such as musculoskeletal disorders. But in contrast this study revealed there was no significant difference between number of patients attended per day (p = 0.765) and mean number of working hours per week (p = 0.204) in relation to occurrence of NSIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In agreement Trinkoff, Brown & Lipscomb, 2007 in her study in United States described that long working hours, working off-shifts and working on week-ends contributes significantly to NSIs and other injuries and illnesses such as musculoskeletal disorders. But in contrast this study revealed there was no significant difference between number of patients attended per day (p = 0.765) and mean number of working hours per week (p = 0.204) in relation to occurrence of NSIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The sample sizes ranged from 34 RNs to over 10,000, and the studies were geographically diverse. Most studies were cross-sectional with the exception of a set of three longitudinal analyses conducted by one research team 27,28) , and a study by Hofmann and Mark 29) . The unit of analysis also varied, with the majority of researchers analyzing individual RNs (n=9), followed by nursing unit (n=4), and one that analyzed hospital level data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors (12) have found that the frequent manipulation of hollow-bore needles is considered a risk factor for percutaneous accidents (OR=1.02; CI(95%):1.01-1.03) among health professionals, while not recapping needles was identified as a protective factor (OR= 0.74; CI(95%): 0.60-0.91), after adjustment for potential confounding variables. Another study (13) showed that the chances of needlestick injuries In a case-control study held in a community base, the authors (14) concluded that interviews result in better quality of information about occupational exposure than mail questionnaires, being considered as the gold standard for data collection when this kind of exposure is considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%