1982
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/15/10/029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work function measurements on (110), (100) and (111) surfaces of silver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
100
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
28
100
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We recently employed time-integrated nonlinear photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) to map the LSP-enhanced electromagnetic fields in the vicinity of plasmonic silver nanoparticles supported on a silver thin film. 14 Under 400 nm fs laser irradiation, a two-photon excitation process is required to exceed the work function of silver (~4.2 eV 19 ). The photoelectron yield is thus proportional to the square of the laser intensity, or the fourth power of the local electric field.…”
Section: Imaging Localized and Propagating Surface Plasmons With Nonlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently employed time-integrated nonlinear photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) to map the LSP-enhanced electromagnetic fields in the vicinity of plasmonic silver nanoparticles supported on a silver thin film. 14 Under 400 nm fs laser irradiation, a two-photon excitation process is required to exceed the work function of silver (~4.2 eV 19 ). The photoelectron yield is thus proportional to the square of the laser intensity, or the fourth power of the local electric field.…”
Section: Imaging Localized and Propagating Surface Plasmons With Nonlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multitude of experimental methods have been used to show that the work function of different crystal faces of the same metal can vary over hundreds of meV [28][29][30]. These experimentally observed variations have been corroborated by theoretical studies and ab initio calculations [31,32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For the same metal, different planes have different workfunction and the atomically rough surface has a smaller workfunction than the atomically smooth surface such as fcc (111). For example, the workfunction of the (110) and (111) surfaces is 4.14 (+0.04 or -0.04) eV and 4.46 (+0.02 or -0.02) eV for Ag [23], 4.48 eV and 4.94 eV for Cu, respectively [24]. We can again see that the plane with a smaller workfunction grows faster (preferentially).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%