“…The surface chemical functionality is not fully accepted: some authors submit the presence of surface hydroxyl [11] others-that concentration of OH is negligible [12], but it is quite evident that cleanliness and chemical state of the surface are critically important for the efficient hole-injection. Many recent reports describe the results of various forms of ITO surface modification including ultra-violet ozone cleaning, argon ion bombardment, oxygen plasma exposure, annealing, exposure by acids and bases, hydrogen peroxide, adsorption of metals with high workfunctions, dielectric oxides, copper phthalocyanine, and various organic compounds [4][5][6][7][8]10,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, although these treatments have been shown to increase the work-function of ITO and hole efficiency, possible physical decohesion at the hydrophobic HTL-hydrophilic oxide anode interface has frequently been ignored.…”