2019
DOI: 10.1080/15416518.2019.1574547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work–Family Conflict and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Moderating Role of Regulatory Focus and Mediating Role of Affect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, construction professionals who spend energy and effort on the fulfillment of work and family roles are more likely to slack off at work to protect their resources (e.g., working slowly) or replenish their resources (e.g., working on a personal matter, or taking a longer break). Work–family conflict can thus be taken as a precursor to voluntary deviant behavior [ 42 ]. On this basis, the following hypotheses are proposed:…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, construction professionals who spend energy and effort on the fulfillment of work and family roles are more likely to slack off at work to protect their resources (e.g., working slowly) or replenish their resources (e.g., working on a personal matter, or taking a longer break). Work–family conflict can thus be taken as a precursor to voluntary deviant behavior [ 42 ]. On this basis, the following hypotheses are proposed:…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cohen & Golan [32] argue that, even if there are WFP, the organisation may experience high work absenteeism if these policies are not properly implemented. Further, if labour policies are also not properly implemented in the company, then the conflict between work and family can lead to numerous negative consequences in the workplace, that is, certain counterproductive work behaviours for the organisation and its members, as is the case regarding work absenteeism [38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in the area of the work-life interface has predominantly been focused on the conflict perspective (Geraldes et al, 2018;O'Neill and Follmer, 2020;Talukder, 2019). It has been well acknowledged and established by researchers that employees who encounter conflict between work and non-work demands more often experience detrimental individual outcomes such as poor physical and psychological health, negative impact on marital life and job-related consequences such as absenteeism, turnover, job dissatisfaction and burnout (Baral and Sampath, 2019;Ferri et al, 2018;Selvarajan et al, 2019). A plethora of literature on interference perspective have examined various antecedents contributing to WFC and FWC, such as work overload, hours worked, family demands, family pressures, neuroticism and low self-efficacy (Baral, 2019;Chan et al, 2020;Cheng et al, 2019;Weale et al, 2020).…”
Section: Impact Of Different Forms Of Contextual (Situational) Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, employees' perceptions of workplace support reflect their belief that their organization appreciates their contribution and hard work and is apprehensive about their well-being. Furthermore, such support seeks to encourage the proper scheduling of tasks, allowing employees to find solutions tailored to their specific needs (Chan et al, 2020;O'Neill and Follmer, 2020;Selvarajan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Impact Of Different Forms Of Contextual (Situational) Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%