Work disengagement among SME workers: evidence from India

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the two alternative theoretical explanations of disengagement at work. Following the job demands-resources (JD-R) perspective, the relationship between job complexity and disengagement is tested. In accordance with the process model of burnout, the association between exhaustion and disengagement is examined. The paper also examines conservation of resources (COR) as an integrative framework as far as the moderating role of resilience in both these relationships is concerned. Design/methodology/approach Survey-based quantitative methodology was followed. A total of 138 employees of an agro-processing unit in North India were surveyed, and 119 usable responses were obtained. Besides the constructs of interest, the questionnaire also sought responses on the relevant demographic variables. Findings Both job complexity and exhaustion predicted disengagement at work. However, contrary to a negatively hypothesized relationship between job complexity and disengagement, a positive association was found. Resilience was found to be negatively moderating exhaustion-disengagement relationship. No influence of resilience was found on the complexity-disengagement association. Research limitations/implications The findings could be specific to the sample and to India. Caution should be exercised while generalizing. Future researchers should validate the findings across contexts. Practical implications The results suggest that complexity may not necessarily be perceived as a resource. Hence organizations must invest in training and skill development programs for their workers. Further, managers should assess resilience as an important component while selecting workers. Originality/value Contrary findings vis-à-vis job complexity and disengagement could have implications for the JD-R perspective. Further, this research integrates alternative explanations of disengagement employing the COR framework.

Self-efficacy and workplace well-being: moderating role of sustainability practices

“…The link between self-efficacy, sustainable practices and workplace well-being provides ample scope for trainers and OD practitioners to redesign their HR systems to enable their employees to become more efficient, resilient and competent and to sustain these under difficult circumstances. Since people with high self-efficacy are more resilient, they are likely to be more engaged in their work and sustainable practices will reduce disengagement at work (Rastogi et al , 2018). The findings of the paper also theoretically indicate that self-efficacy and sustainable practices not only enhance employee well-being at work, but may also improve employee performance and innovative work behavior and other job-related outcomes (i.e.…”

Modeling the impact of employee engagement and happiness on burnout and turnover intention among blue-collar workers at a manufacturing company

“…Similarly, shop-floor employees are also expected to deliver discretionary efforts to meet productivity and performance targets and consequently, they are exposed to higher burnout levels. Moreover, continuous working with machines results in highly demanding jobs (Rastogi et al , 2018) and which might consequently increase the burnout among shop-floor employees.…”

Role of Ergonomic Factors Affecting Production of Leather Garment-Based SMEs of India: Implications for Social Sustainability

“…According to Workplace Safety and Health Guidelines, an Occupational Disease (OD) is contracted as a result of exposure to risk factors in a working environment [1]. The incidence of occupational disease is increasing among workers in production sectors [2]. This issue has received much attention, but only after the United Nations, with their sustainable development goals (SDG), defined sustainable industrialization as one of seventeen goals to alleviate poverty, improve workers' health, and enhance social prosperity.…”