Wordsworth's Philosophic Song

Abstract

Wordsworth wrote that he longed to compose 'some philosophic Song/Of Truth that cherishes our daily life'. Yet he never finished The Recluse, his long philosophical poem. Simon Jarvis argues that Wordsworth's aspiration to 'philosophic song' is central to his greatness, and changed the way English poetry was written. Some critics see Wordworth as a systematic thinker, while for others he is a poet first, and a thinker only (if at all) second. Jarvis shows instead how essential both philosophy and the 'song' of poetry were to Wordsworth's achievement. Drawing on advanced work in continental philosophy and social theory to address the ideological attacks which have dominated much recent commentary, Jarvis reads Wordsworth's writing both critically and philosophically, to show how Wordsworth thinks through and in verse. This study rethinks the relation between poetry and society itself by analysing the tensions between thinking philosophically and writing poetry.

Pleasure, Happiness and Romanticism: A Critical Survey

“…The return to prominence of aesthetics, and a concomitant return to canonical writers, has made it possible for a new look at the philosophical and artistic concerns in which Wordsworth’s writing is embedded. One of the most distinctive works in this newly sympathetic vein is Jarvis’s (2007) Wordsworth’s Philosophic Song . In a chapter entitled ‘Happiness’, Jarvis explores Wordsworth’s use of a dialogue between St.…”

The ocular truth: C.L.R. James's England

“…If we simply read disenchantment as disillusion or duplicity (as Robinson and Scott seem to do), we commit the same error of failing to see its mystification as anything more than failure or ruin, as a kind of exorbitant negativity whose illusory, romantic form operates precisely by means of a materialist disenchantment. Wordsworth cautioned against this, as did James . James's romanticism is a critique of English imperialist ideology but in a profoundly dialectical, speculative sense.…”