2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wood waste decomposition in landfills: An assessment of current knowledge and implications for emissions reporting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The default value of DOC f = 0.5 is an average for the SWDSs and might not represent any single waste component (Wang et al, 2011). There has been some work to quantify values for individual waste components (Kim and Yi, 2009; O’Dwyer et al, 2018; Ryu, 2010; Ţugui et al, 2006; Wang et al, 2015; Ximenes et al, 2015). Table 2 includes component-specific DOC f values from modeled and measured efforts.…”
Section: Global Review Of Ipcc Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The default value of DOC f = 0.5 is an average for the SWDSs and might not represent any single waste component (Wang et al, 2011). There has been some work to quantify values for individual waste components (Kim and Yi, 2009; O’Dwyer et al, 2018; Ryu, 2010; Ţugui et al, 2006; Wang et al, 2015; Ximenes et al, 2015). Table 2 includes component-specific DOC f values from modeled and measured efforts.…”
Section: Global Review Of Ipcc Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these slow rates of gas generation after the easily-degradable matter has depleted are insufficient for energy generation or flaring, and so the biogas typically escapes into the atmosphere. As landfill biogas mainly comprises of methane and carbon dioxide, which are two major contributors to climate change (O'Dwyer et al, 2017), this is not a sustainable situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ximenes et al, 2015). Based on this, using the IPCC 0.5 default fraction as in this inventory, appears to overestimate losses from wood products (O'Dwyer et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Role Of End Of Life Carbon In Wood Productsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Other than this shift towards bioenergy, the carbon reservoir in SWDS is rather stable because 1) it is rather insensitive to changes in harvest levels; 2) all products are assumed to decompose at the same rate, and; 3) there is an inert part of the stock that accumulates (Pingoud & Wagner, 2006). While all of these play a role, the fraction of decomposable degradable organic carbon (DOCf) has the largest effect, and there seems to be an agreement on the mechanisms leading to carbon storage under these conditions (Barlaz, 2006;De la Cruz et al, 2013;Micales & Skog, 1997;O'Dwyer, Walshe, & Byrne, 2018;F. A. Ximenes, Kathuria, Barlaz, & Cowie, 2018;F.…”
Section: The Role Of End Of Life Carbon In Wood Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation