2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00107-009-0355-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wood shrinkage: influence of anatomy, cell wall architecture, chemical composition and cambial age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different shrinkage values in relation to the position in the trunk are confi rmed by many authors (Ying et al, 1994;Dumail and Castera, 1997;Kärki, 2001;Perstorper et al, 2001;Wang et al, 2008;Yamashita et al, 2009;Kord et al, 2010;Leonardon et al, 2010). Wood density can be considered the key indicator of wood quality.…”
Section: Uvodmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The different shrinkage values in relation to the position in the trunk are confi rmed by many authors (Ying et al, 1994;Dumail and Castera, 1997;Kärki, 2001;Perstorper et al, 2001;Wang et al, 2008;Yamashita et al, 2009;Kord et al, 2010;Leonardon et al, 2010). Wood density can be considered the key indicator of wood quality.…”
Section: Uvodmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Generally, hardwood pulps seem to show lower hygroexpansion than softwood pulp (*0.23% expansion for softwood, 0.13% for hardwood, paper density of *680 kg/m 3 ) [23]. The longitudinal and transverse expansion coefficients are reported to be 0.5-2.7 and 4-8% for compression wood, 1-2 and 5-8% for juvenile wood and 1-1.5 and 6-12% for mature wood [91]. Similarly, Joffre et al [70] found distinct differences between normal and compression wood tracheids, which can be related to the MFA, lignin content and the cylindrical structure.…”
Section: Fiber Curl and Twistmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Likewise, the chemical characteristics of the fiber seem to have an influence on the effect of the MFA, as compression wood showed lower tangential shrinkage (5.94%) than juvenile wood (8.37%) at the same MFA (14.2°) [91]. Also, the degree of fiber restraining appears to have an effect.…”
Section: Microfibril Anglementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the age group considered, the correlation parameters did not reach consistent values to ensure the dependence between density and shrinkage percentages. Leonardon et al (2010) studied different anatomical and chemical factors of the wood and their influence on shrinkage in the main directions of wood, concluding that anatomical complexity, architecture of the constituent cells, and chemical composition of species can explain more precisely wood shrinkage than just the density of samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%