2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10943-011-9535-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women’s Health Promotion in the Rural Church: A Canadian Perspective

Abstract: The rural church may be an effective health resource for rural Canadian women who have compromised access to health resources. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relevance of the Christian church and faith community nurses in promoting the health of rural Canadian women in the evolving rural context. The findings from an extensive literature search reveal that religion and spirituality often influence the health beliefs, behaviors, and decisions of rural Canadian women. The church and faith community … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Voorhees et al’s observed that the “propensity of Baptist churches to address smoking ‘as a sin’ and to negatively sanction it, may play an important role in enabling culturally specific spiritual interventions” (p. 282, Voorhees et al 1996) This observation may no longer be as salient as it once was, or may not apply to an Appalachian population. As Plunkett and Leipert (2013) note, health promotion in rural churches may be most acceptable when it converges closely with the church’s healing mission; when programming diverges from the church’s values, beliefs, and norms, such efforts may be thwarted. Fortunately for the hundreds of Appalachian smokers enrolled in this study, ministers did not describe smoking as sinful or smokers as sinners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Voorhees et al’s observed that the “propensity of Baptist churches to address smoking ‘as a sin’ and to negatively sanction it, may play an important role in enabling culturally specific spiritual interventions” (p. 282, Voorhees et al 1996) This observation may no longer be as salient as it once was, or may not apply to an Appalachian population. As Plunkett and Leipert (2013) note, health promotion in rural churches may be most acceptable when it converges closely with the church’s healing mission; when programming diverges from the church’s values, beliefs, and norms, such efforts may be thwarted. Fortunately for the hundreds of Appalachian smokers enrolled in this study, ministers did not describe smoking as sinful or smokers as sinners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Kosmin and Keyser 2008) Additionally, public health and faith communities’ goals often overlap and are mutually advantageous and reinforcing: many faith communities support efforts to improve physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being, while the public health community often acknowledges that social and spiritual support from churches reinforce health promotion efforts. (Plunkett and Leipert 2013) Finally, FBHP is often efficacious, with results frequently demonstrating increased knowledge of disease, willingness to engage in primary and secondary prevention activities, and reduced risks associated with disease. (Kaplan et al 2006; Studts et al 2012)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because churches are often value-laden places with significant ties to religious doctrine, the effectiveness of health promotion initiatives may be influenced by a church’s capacity to be compatible with the health-promoting values and beliefs of rural individuals and communities (Plunkett & Leipert, 2013). Congruency between values, beliefs, and cultural norms of churches and the community-at-large needs to be reflected on prior to initiating health-promoting programs in order to elucidate any possible conflicting values (Campbell et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the literature related to health and the church describes health outcomes associated with various forms of religious participation from a postpositivistic perspective (Koenig, King, & Carson, 2012; Plunkett & Leipert, 2013). Often, such research contains little to no gender- or place-based analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%