2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10943-014-9858-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rural Appalachian Faith-Placed Smoking Cessation Intervention

Abstract: Although health promotion programming in faith institutions is promising, most faith-based or placed health projects focus on diet, exercise, or cancer screening and many have been located in urban environments. This article addresses the notable absence of faith programming for smoking cessation among underserved rural US residents who experience tobacco-related health inequities. In this article, we describe our faith-oriented smoking cessation program in rural Appalachia, involving 590 smokers in 26 rural c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is, however, potential for all faiths provided it is recognised that religion is both more complex in terms of its role as an epidemiological construct (Levin 1996) and more complex than is commonly understood in health promotion (Liu et al 2016). As Ward et al (2014) note the link between religion and smoking can vary significantly across different religious communities and must (Schoenberg et al 2015) be deployed with careful attention to community norms if it is to be effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, potential for all faiths provided it is recognised that religion is both more complex in terms of its role as an epidemiological construct (Levin 1996) and more complex than is commonly understood in health promotion (Liu et al 2016). As Ward et al (2014) note the link between religion and smoking can vary significantly across different religious communities and must (Schoenberg et al 2015) be deployed with careful attention to community norms if it is to be effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline characteristics among study participants were similar to BRFSS data, except the self-reported current smoking rate (2.6%) was much lower than expected, suggesting that tobacco use may be less common among Appalachian residents who attend church regularly and voluntarily participate in a health-related study than among the general Appalachian population [57] or that tobacco use is underreported due to a perceived disapproval from fellow church members and church leaders [58]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Specifically, participants completed the MOS social support scale (19 Likert-type items, higher scores indicated higher levels of social support); ( Sherbourne and Stewart, 1991 ) the Fagerström nicotine dependence scale (6-item scale yielding both continuous and categorical levels of nicotine dependence); ( Buckley et al, 2005 ) adapted measures of smoking cessation self-efficacy (10 Likert-type items, higher scores indicated higher levels of self-efficacy); ( Velicer et al, 1995 ) and smoking cessation decisional balance (5 Likert-type items measuring perceived benefits, 5 Likert-type items measuring perceived barriers, higher scores indicated higher levels of each) ( Prochaska and DiClemente, 1983 ). Data from the formative phase focus groups ( Schoenberg et al, 2014 ) guided the development of a 10-item index of barriers to smoking cessation. Standard sociodemographic and health data were also collected, including race, age, education and income levels, insurance coverage, household composition, and a comprehensive series of questions on health status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%