Women's Accounts of Organizational Politics as a Gendering Process

Abstract

Organizational politics is implicated in all levels of organizational functioning, from power structures and informal interaction to individual identity. This study argues that organizational politics provides an approach to examining professional women's experiences of organizations as gendered. Women graduates in male-dominated organizations claimed not to be limited by explicit discrimination, but they construct organizational politics as being masculine in character and as a barrier to their careers. These women represent organizational politics as irrational, aggressive, competitive and instrumental, leading to individual, not organizational, success. Their accounts undermine the stereotypical dichotomy of masculine rationality and feminine emotion by claiming that women behave reasonably and by focusing on emotion in men's political game playing. However, claiming to be rational and rejecting politics, while acknowledging its role in career success, is uncomfortable for ambitious women. They risk sabotaging their own position by appearing too sensitive to engage in the less savoury aspects of organizational life. Organizational political processes are seen as fundamental to gender in organizations, first, because political activity is seen as gendered and masculine and contrary to female identity; secondly, because politics is part of the informal system which constructs organization from which outsiders are excluded; and finally, because political activity is linked to the performance, achievement and maintenance of power.

Excellence in university academic staff evaluation: a problematic reality?

“…However, there is evidence that, even in terms of quantity, the gap between men and women's research output is reducing, with the remaining gap being explained by differential access to resources, level and discipline (Xie and Shauman 1998;EU 2004). For some women the problem was women's failure to 'market' their achievements (Mackenzie Davey 2008). Some pragmatically accepted that this was necessary, although they saw it as a male strategy: I feel like for instance, maybe it's a woman thing, but I certainly wasn't selling myself the way I should have.…”

Empirical Evidence Illuminating Gendered Regimes in UK Higher Education: Developing a New Conceptual Framework

“…Furthermore, there is a body of research which argues strongly that organisational cultures are not only gendered but also gendering [32][33][34]. Karatas-Ozkan and Chell [35] help explain the notion of gendering by describing gender as:…”

Kraliçe Arı Sendromu Bağlamında Kadın Öğretmenlerin Kadın Yöneticilere İlişkin Görüşleri

“…İş adamı iş insanı ve bilim adamı da bilim insanı kavramlarıyla daha yeni yeni kabullenilmeye başlanmıştır. Ayrıca, kadınlara özgü çalışma stilleri üzerinde erkeklere özgü yaklaşımlar tercih edilmekte ve kadın rol model eksikliği hissedilmektedir (Bickford, 2011;Davey, 2008;Linehan ve Scullion, 2008). Kadın çalışanların üst yönetici pozisyonlarına gelmelerini engelleyen etmenler arasında Cam Tavan Sendromu (CTS) ve Kraliçe Arı Sendromu (KAS) sayılabilir.…”