2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12147-008-9051-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women are Victims, Men Make Choices: The Invisibility of Men and Boys in the Global Sex Trade

Abstract: The invisibility of men and boys in scholarly discussions of the global sex trade was analyzed through a sample of 166 recent articles published in social science journals. Most failed to acknowledge the existence of male sex workers at all. When male sex workers were discussed, they were assigned considerably more agency than female sex workers, the chief danger ascribed to them was HIV rather than violence, and the question of their sexual orientation was always addressed, whereas female sex workers were alw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
84
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 The proportion of female to male victims is unknown, because reliable estimates of the prevalence of human trafficking are unavailable. Much more attention has been paid to female victims, and this may be related to a number of factors, including higher proportions of females being identified as victims in large-scale studies, 3,14 evidence to suggest that female victims are more likely than males to be controlled by pimps, 5 public discomfort with the idea of males having sex with men, public misperception that males cannot be objectified or coerced, 24 and a general lack of screening boys for possible CSEC activity. 18 It is likely that the number of male victims is grossly underestimated, because males may be less likely to be seen as victims by themselves 5 or others.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Csecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The proportion of female to male victims is unknown, because reliable estimates of the prevalence of human trafficking are unavailable. Much more attention has been paid to female victims, and this may be related to a number of factors, including higher proportions of females being identified as victims in large-scale studies, 3,14 evidence to suggest that female victims are more likely than males to be controlled by pimps, 5 public discomfort with the idea of males having sex with men, public misperception that males cannot be objectified or coerced, 24 and a general lack of screening boys for possible CSEC activity. 18 It is likely that the number of male victims is grossly underestimated, because males may be less likely to be seen as victims by themselves 5 or others.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Csecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically the political and policy emphasis on the regulation of female sexuality meant that the boundaries and particular working practices of male sex workers (henceforth MSWs) remained relatively hidden and under-scrutinised (Dennis, 2008;Minichiello & Scott, 2014;Weitzer, 2009;Whowell, 2010). Early research into male prostitution emphasised its psychopathological nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By emphasizing "especially Women and Children" in the title of the law, exploitation was defined in a way that highlighted women and children as the victims, with no mention of adult males (Kimm & Sauer, 2010). The influence of the NGO was so profound that the shifting frame of the trafficking victim is reflected in scholarly discussions of sex workers (forced or voluntary) that nearly always specify "she," "her," or "the women," (Dennis, 2008).…”
Section: Mobilizing Resources In the Movement Against Human Traffickingmentioning
confidence: 99%