Contemporary Issues in Leadership 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9780429494000-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women and the Labyrinth of Leadership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
359
0
33

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(403 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
359
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, our study extends debates about the potential negative impact of having a low number of women – or just a single one – in high‐level teams (Helfat et al, ; Eagly and Carli, ). Our results indicate that even a low degree of gender diversity does not inhibit a correlation between openness to diversity and performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Second, our study extends debates about the potential negative impact of having a low number of women – or just a single one – in high‐level teams (Helfat et al, ; Eagly and Carli, ). Our results indicate that even a low degree of gender diversity does not inhibit a correlation between openness to diversity and performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Consequently, it may lead to enhanced monitoring of managers (Carter et al, ), and the reporting of CSR matters may alleviate agency costs (Hillman & Dalziel, ). According to the gender socialisation theory (sociological, psychological, and cognitive perspectives), female directors are characterised by their sensitiveness, friendliness, and carefulness, attributes that lead them to behave in a cooperative way (Kim, ), in contrast to male leaders, who are very competitive (Eagly & Carli, ). Similarly, Nielsen and Huse () and Matsa and Miller () demonstrate that female leaders are more sensitive and attentive to stakeholders' demands regarding social responsibility issues, and Bear, Rahman, and Post () found that women bring sensitivity towards CSR reporting and participatory decision‐making style to boards.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on gender differences in leadership style indicates that women leaders are more sensitive, gentle, sympathetic, and caring, while male leaders are characterized as being autocratic, self‐confident, and dominant (H. Kim, ). Women leaders are more relationship oriented and seek cooperation rather than competition, while male leaders are task oriented and are associated with effective leadership (Eagly & Carli, ). However, literature on gender differences in leadership has not delivered consistent study findings.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%