Women 1.5 Times More Likely to Leave STEM Pipeline after Calculus Compared to Men: Lack of Mathematical Confidence a Potential Culprit

Abstract

The substantial gender gap in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce can be traced back to the underrepresentation of women at various milestones in the career pathway. Calculus is a necessary step in this pathway and has been shown to often dissuade people from pursuing STEM fields. We examine the characteristics of students who begin college interested in STEM and either persist or switch out of the calculus sequence after taking Calculus I, and hence either continue to pursue a STEM major or are dissuaded from STEM disciplines. The data come from a unique, national survey focused on mainstream college calculus. Our analyses show that, while controlling for academic preparedness, career intentions, and instruction, the odds of a woman being dissuaded from continuing in calculus is 1.5 times greater than that for a man. Furthermore, women report they do not understand the course material well enough to continue significantly more often than men. When comparing women and men with above-average mathematical abilities and preparedness, we find women start and end the term with significantly lower mathematical confidence than men. This suggests a lack of mathematical confidence, rather than a lack of mathematically ability, may be responsible for the high departure rate of women. While it would be ideal to increase interest and participation of women in STEM at all stages of their careers, our findings indicate that if women persisted in STEM at the same rate as men starting in Calculus I, the number of women entering the STEM workforce would increase by 75%.

Diversity in geoscience: Participation, behaviour, and the division of scientific labour at a Canadian geoscience conference

“…Well-known issues such as familial obligation and childbirth have been identified as constraints on women's participation in science, but increasingly research is revealing the subtle and invisible ways in which scientific cultures privilege certain perspectives, bodies, and backgrounds and devalue others (Jarreau 2016;Skibba 2016;Cheryan et al 2017;Nelson 2017;Rosen 2017). Studies have shown, for example, that even with identical resumes men are more positively evaluated as scientists relative to women by job search committees (Moss-Racusin et al 2012), that women with equivalent mathematical abilities to men nonetheless feel less confident in their own abilities (Ellis et al 2016), that women are less likely to receive strong reference letters from supervisors (Dutt et al 2016), and that common representations of science to children prominently portray men as scientists whilst women occupy other roles (Kerkhoven et al 2016). In geoscience, researchers have explored how fieldwork has been framed by heroic narratives emphasizing danger, strength, and masculine prowess, which has the effect of making women and others feel lacking or not welcome (Bracken and Mawdsley 2004;Carey et al 2016).…”

Enhancing Diversity in Biomedical Data Science

“…Many underrepresented and low-income students are placed into remediation mathematics courses that often only extend the time to completion, increase the cost of education with little success in improving graduation rates, and carry significant stigma. 13 In addition, student lack of identity as a "math person" and confidence/selfefficacy in mathematics can greatly affect students' perseverance, especially in female students, in mathematics courses such as calculus, 14,15 which is a vital and required course for most majors relevant to BDS.…”

“…It must enhance the breadth of understanding of the students of how these disciplines can be integrated, which can be difficult to achieve since many undergraduate programs are not interdisciplinary in a true sense. 18 Early exposure to the potential careers available in BDS 15 and clear articulation of the necessary academic preparation for those careers is paramount to recruiting underrepresented students into BDS fields.…”

Co-Calculus: Integrating the Academic and the Social

“…While these effects impact all students, they differentially impact non-dominant students. For instance, female students with the same grades as their male counterparts are 1.5 times as likely to leave the calculus sequence (Ellis, Fosdick, & Rasmussen, 2016). …”