2010
DOI: 10.1007/s13147-009-0002-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wohnstandortentscheidungen von Haushalten am Beispiel Mannheim

Abstract: B e r i c h t a u s F o r s c h u n g u n d P r a x i sZusammenfassung die einwohnerzahl Mannheims wird sich bis ende 2025 auf 312.700 Personen leicht erhöhen. die stadt befürchtet, wie andere deutsche großstädte auch, als Folge anhaltender suburbanisierung und der Zuzugsüberschüsse aus dem ausland eine andauernde soziale entmischung. Vor diesem hintergrund wurde von der stadt Mannheim und der gBg-Mannheimer Wohnungsbaugesellschaft mbh eine Wanderungsmotivanalyse in auftrag gegeben. nach einer kurzen inhaltlic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, democratic politics have no instruments to influence household forms directly without intruding into personal privacy and freedom. Differences in average household sizes in urban and rural areas result from selfselection processes, with students, working singles and double income households preferring the city, whereas families with only one bread-winner and a certain number of children often move to the semi-periphery (Gans et al, 2010). However, and as historical or international comparisons show, these self-selection processes can assume different shapes depending on the present social circumstances, whichin turnare not written in stone but are subject to cultural, political and economic change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, democratic politics have no instruments to influence household forms directly without intruding into personal privacy and freedom. Differences in average household sizes in urban and rural areas result from selfselection processes, with students, working singles and double income households preferring the city, whereas families with only one bread-winner and a certain number of children often move to the semi-periphery (Gans et al, 2010). However, and as historical or international comparisons show, these self-selection processes can assume different shapes depending on the present social circumstances, whichin turnare not written in stone but are subject to cultural, political and economic change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…how individuals and households adapt to demographic change by migration. Based on a survey among mobile households in Mannheim, Gans et al (2010) find that among the motives of migration out of Mannheim, apart from moving in with a partner and job change, the (inadequate) size of dwelling was dominant. For some of these households, availability of housing in low-density areas within the municipal boundaries of the large cities may be a welcome alternative to leaving the city in favour of the suburban zone in the future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%