2018
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2017.2779866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WMGR: A Generic and Compact Routing Scheme for Data Center Networks

Abstract: Data center networks (DCNs) connect hundreds and thousands of computers and, as a result of the exponential growth in their number of nodes, the design of scalable (compact) routing schemes plays a pivotal role in the optimal operation of the DCN. Traditional trends in the design of DCN architectures have led to solutions, where routing schemes and network topologies are interdependent, i.e., specialized routing schemes. Unlike these, we propose a routing scheme that is compact and generic, i.e., independent o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Azizi et al [65] compare a novel DCCube design with fat tree, Flattened Butterfly, BCube and SWCube, where the former achieves both higher performance and lower cost consideringthe number of switches, server NICs, server CPUs and cabling. Furthermore, Aguirre et al [66] propose a greedy forwarding strategy that is independent of the network topology in place and obtains acceptable results,whilst Mohamed et al [67] present average networking equipment power consumption for different topologies, showing that fat tree, leaf and spine, BCube and DCell obtain the highest outcome.In terms of creating a specific coefficient to measure performance in a data center, most efforts have been focused on energy efficiency. For instance, Sego et al [68] come up with a metric called Data Center Energy Productivity (DCeP) as the ratio of useful work produced to the energy consumed to get that work done.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azizi et al [65] compare a novel DCCube design with fat tree, Flattened Butterfly, BCube and SWCube, where the former achieves both higher performance and lower cost consideringthe number of switches, server NICs, server CPUs and cabling. Furthermore, Aguirre et al [66] propose a greedy forwarding strategy that is independent of the network topology in place and obtains acceptable results,whilst Mohamed et al [67] present average networking equipment power consumption for different topologies, showing that fat tree, leaf and spine, BCube and DCell obtain the highest outcome.In terms of creating a specific coefficient to measure performance in a data center, most efforts have been focused on energy efficiency. For instance, Sego et al [68] come up with a metric called Data Center Energy Productivity (DCeP) as the ratio of useful work produced to the energy consumed to get that work done.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network topology used in WBSNs vary based on proposed solutions. These topologies including Star, Mesh, hypercube [33] affect the network in many areas such as accuracy, efficiency and resiliency. The results of network efficiency and resiliency reflected on the solutions by providing less data gathering delay and reduce power consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%