Wittgenstein's Inspiring View of Nature: On Connecting Philosophy and Science Aright

Abstract

This paper explicates Wittgenstein's vision of our place in nature and shows in what ways it is unlike and more fruitful than the picture of nature promoted by exclusive scientific naturalists. Wittgenstein's vision of nature is bound up with and supports his signature view that the task of philosophy is distinctively descriptive rather than explanatory. Highlighting what makes Wittgenstein's vision of nature special, it has been claimed that to the extent that he qualifies as a naturalist of any sort he ought to be regarded as a liberal naturalist (Macarthur forthcoming, Wittgenstein, Philosophy of Mind and Naturalism. London: Routledge). We argue, in contrast, that focusing solely on the liberality of Wittgenstein's view of nature risks overlooking and downplaying the ways in which his philosophical clarifications can act as a platform for productively engaging with the sciences in their explanatory endeavors. We argue that Wittgenstein's vision of nature allows for a more relaxed form of naturalism in which philosophy can be a productive partner for scientific inquiry and investigation. Although this feature of Wittgenstein's vision of nature is not something that he himself emphasized, given his interests and concerns, it is an inspiring vision in an age in which philosophy must find its feet with and alongside the sciences.

The Problem of Meaning in AI and Robotics: Still with Us after All These Years

“…For representationalist AI it would be important to extend the classical Turing machine in a direction that would make indeterminacy an intrinsic aspect of its operation, perhaps in terms of entropy arising from distributed computations [80], or perhaps by taking advantage of decoherence and other noise 2 We focus here on the contributions of phenomenological philosophy because we are most familiar with that tradition. Yet we certainly recognize that there are other traditions that have much to offer for the development of a suitably revised concept of nature, including the speculative naturalist philosophy going back to Peirce and Whitehead, as well as contemporary movements within analytic philosophy that argue for more "liberal" [78] and "relaxed" forms of naturalism [79]. Future work could compare and contrast these diverse proposals.…”

Going wide: extended mind and Wittgenstein

“…10. The way I have used Wittgenstein's philosophical approach in the text is compatible with the position defended by Hutto and Satne (2018), who claim that philosophical clarification, inspired by Wittgenstein's relaxed view of naturalism, can have scientific benefits. 11.…”

Getting real about pretense

“…Taking a leaf out of Wittgenstein's book, RE sets out with descriptive and clarifying naturalistic ambitions rather than seeking to provide a metaphysically robust, reductive analysis of pretense (see Hutto 2013, Hutto & Satne, 2018a2018b). Carrying through on such ambitions requires looking closely at the many and various forms of pretense and the many different patterns and ways they figure and manifest themselves in our lives and practices.…”