2021
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within‐year and among‐year variation in impacts of targeted conservation management on juvenile survival in a threatened population

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cook et al, 2013;Toomey et al, 2016;Williams et al, 2020). To fulfil academic objectives, primary scientific papers were strategically published in British Ecological Society journals, targeted at general concept-led international audiences spanning pure and applied ecology (Journal of Animal Ecology: Reid et al, 2003aReid et al, † , 2003bReid et al, ‡ , 2004Reid et al, , 2006Reid et al, , 2008Reid et al, , 2010Trask et al, 2016Trask et al, † , 2017Journal of Applied Ecology: Reid et al, 2011;Trask et al, 2019;Fenn et al, 2020Fenn et al, , 2021; total >685 citations, Google Scholar October 2021, Elton prize ‡ winner, † highly commended). Yet, while these papers retained some system-specific context, the focus on general conceptual rather than system-specific impact (as required for these BES journals) meant that the full process of pure-applied integration and its application to chough conservation was not previously visible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Cook et al, 2013;Toomey et al, 2016;Williams et al, 2020). To fulfil academic objectives, primary scientific papers were strategically published in British Ecological Society journals, targeted at general concept-led international audiences spanning pure and applied ecology (Journal of Animal Ecology: Reid et al, 2003aReid et al, † , 2003bReid et al, ‡ , 2004Reid et al, , 2006Reid et al, , 2008Reid et al, , 2010Trask et al, 2016Trask et al, † , 2017Journal of Applied Ecology: Reid et al, 2011;Trask et al, 2019;Fenn et al, 2020Fenn et al, , 2021; total >685 citations, Google Scholar October 2021, Elton prize ‡ winner, † highly commended). Yet, while these papers retained some system-specific context, the focus on general conceptual rather than system-specific impact (as required for these BES journals) meant that the full process of pure-applied integration and its application to chough conservation was not previously visible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we used individual-based models incorporating inbreeding depression alongside environmental and demographic stochasticity to examine the degrees to which ecological management to improve habitat and increase food abundance, and/or genetic management to reduce inbreeding, could increase λ and ultimately population size (Trask et al, 2019). Models were parameterised using spatially structured estimates of baseline vital rates from the long-term demographic monitoring (Reid et al, 2004(Reid et al, , 2006, and used the estimated effects of supplementary feeding as a proxy for how much vital rates could potentially be increased through habitat management (Fenn et al, 2020(Fenn et al, , 2021Trask et al, 2020). The population-wide degree of inbreeding was estimated from microsatellite variation.…”
Section: Phase Five: Integration Of Ecological and Genetic Threatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations