2006
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Within‐group female–female agonistic interactions in Taiwanese macaques (Macaca cyclopis)

Abstract: Feeding-related agonism among wild female Taiwanese macaques was investigated in two study groups at ecologically diverse sites (Fu-shan and Ken-ting) to determine whether contest-feeding competition was present in these groups. Females that contest for food within a primate group are hypothesized to form dominance hierarchies and tend to be philopatric. In this study we tested 1) whether Taiwanese macaque females show higher agonism in a feeding context, 2) whether they exhibit stronger agonism over higher-qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
6
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…: Boinski et al, 2002;Cebus capucinus: Vogel, 2005; Macaca spp. : Su & Birky, 2007;Lemur catta: White et al, 2007;Gorilla beringei: Robbins, 2008;Erythrocebus patas: Nakagawa, 2008; Microcebus berthae and M. murinus: Dammhahn & Kappeler, 2009). Moreover, in accordance with previous studies, we found that food sources of intermediate size generated more agonism, thus, were more usurpable, than food sources with shorter or longer residence times (Janson, 1990;Chancellor & Isbell, 2009).…”
Section: Competitive Regime Over Foodsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…: Boinski et al, 2002;Cebus capucinus: Vogel, 2005; Macaca spp. : Su & Birky, 2007;Lemur catta: White et al, 2007;Gorilla beringei: Robbins, 2008;Erythrocebus patas: Nakagawa, 2008; Microcebus berthae and M. murinus: Dammhahn & Kappeler, 2009). Moreover, in accordance with previous studies, we found that food sources of intermediate size generated more agonism, thus, were more usurpable, than food sources with shorter or longer residence times (Janson, 1990;Chancellor & Isbell, 2009).…”
Section: Competitive Regime Over Foodsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Second, females established linear (strongly unidirectional) and stable (low proportion of reversals, that is, lower-ranking females won in agonistic interactions with higher-ranking females: ZA = 1%; CH = 2.5%) dominance hierarchies, a result consistent with several comparative studies showing that more linear and formalized hierarchies are formed when female primates face high levels of within-group contest competition over food (i.e., Macaca spp. : Su & Birky, 2007;Saimiri spp. : Boinski et al, 2002;Pan troglodytes: Wittig & Boesch, 2003;Semnopithecus entellus: Koenig, 2000;Koenig et al, 1998; Presbytis thomasi and M. fascicularis: Sterck & Steenbeek, 1997;E.…”
Section: Female Social Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apesar das críticas, diversos estudos de campo vêm apresentando resultados que apóiam as previsões dos modelos socioecológicos, especialmente entre espécies de cercopitecóides (Sterck & Steenbeek, 1997;Isbell et al, 1998;Pruetz & Isbell, 2000;Harris, 2006;Su & Birky, 2007;Nakagawa, 2008;Teichroeb & Sicotte, 2009) e lêmures (Kappeler, 1999;Eberle & Kappeler, 2002;White et al, 2007;Dammhahn & Kappeler, 2009). Em relação aos primatas do Novo Mundo, argumenta-se que a sua longa trajetória evolutiva separada dos primatas do Velho Mundo (cerca de 30 MA - Fleagle, 1999), provavelmente resultou em sistemas sociais fundamentalmente diversos dos observados em primatas do Velho Mundo (Isbell & Young, 2002).…”
Section: Socioecologia De Primatasunclassified
“…Esse resultado é consistente com o trabalho de Janson (1985), que encontrou que em C. apella a intensidade da competição direta por recursos com distribuição discreta resultou na formação de hierarquias de dominância lineares, e com vários estudos que mostraram que fêmeas primatas estabelecem hierarquias mais lineares quanto submetidas a forte pressão de competição direta por alimento (p. ex., Macaca spp: Su & Birky;Hanya et al, 2008;Saimiri spp: Mitchell et al, 1991;Boinski et al, 2002; Pan troglodytes: Wittig & Boesch, 2003;Semnopithecus entellus: Koenig, 2000; Presbytis entellus: Koenig et al, 1998; P. thomasi e M. fascicularis: Sterck & Steenbeek, 1997;E. patas e C. aethiops: Nakagawa, 2008).…”
Section: Competição Indireta Entre Gruposunclassified
“…It is often observed that the individuals of a highly specialized fruit-eating species compete directly with each other for food [Sterck and Steenbeck, 1997;Su and Birky, 2007]. Such within-group contest competition often involves aggression and leads to differences in foraging efficiency between the high-and the low-ranked individuals, with the high-ranked females benefitting from increased foraging efficiency [Whitten, 1983;Saito, 1996;Vogel, 2005].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%