2015
DOI: 10.1037/hea0000211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

With others or alone? Adolescent individual differences in the context of smoking lapses.

Abstract: Objective Although a great deal of adolescent smoking research has investigated predictors of initiation, much less has focused on predictors of lapsing during a quit attempt. In particular, the role of social context may deserve greater attention in models of adolescent smoking cessation. Therefore, the present investigation aimed to use ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in order to examine individual differences in social lapsing—the extent to which lapses occur around others vs. when alone. Methods An… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identical affect items were presented at both the random and self-initiated smoking assessments. Two previous manuscripts have been published from this data, however, these manuscripts did not examine the role of implicit attitude; further detail on methods are available here (see Hoeppner, Kahler, & Gwaltney, 2014; Roberts, Bidwell, Colby, & Gwaltney, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identical affect items were presented at both the random and self-initiated smoking assessments. Two previous manuscripts have been published from this data, however, these manuscripts did not examine the role of implicit attitude; further detail on methods are available here (see Hoeppner, Kahler, & Gwaltney, 2014; Roberts, Bidwell, Colby, & Gwaltney, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these points should be taken into account when applying EMA. In fact, the sample size in this study is within the range of most other studies in clinical[ 12 - 14 , 24 ] or community[ 9 - 11 , 25 ] adolescent populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The method is well suited to examining intermittent occurrences, such as use of tobacco and alcohol (Piasecki et al, 2012; Roberts, Bidwell, Colby, & Gwaltney, 2015) and marketing exposure (Kirchner et al, 2013), and overcomes many of the limitations inherent in traditional survey or interview methods by reducing recall error and increasing external validity (Shiffman et al, 2007). For the present study, participants used a smartphone app, PiLR EMA (MEI Research, Edina, MN, USA), that was refined specifically for this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%