2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless energy transfer by means of inductive coupling for dairy cow health monitoring

Abstract: The increase of herd sizes hinders the capability of the dairy farmer to timely detect illnesses. Therefore, automatic health monitoring systems are deployed, but due to their high energy consumption, the application possibilities remain limited. In this work, a wireless, inductive charging solution for dairy cow monitoring is designed. This system is mounted at the eating trough, and the amount of energy transferred each eating turn is determined experimentally. For the first time, inductive wireless power tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, the lifetime of the monitory system should match the animal's lifetime. Recently, research has been performed on the potential of wireless power transfer to power the sensors' batteries during short amounts of times when the cows are drinking or are being milked (Minnaert et al, 2018). A follow-up study with a larger sample size is required to validate the findings from this paper from a relatively limited set of cows and to consider different conditions (e.g., heifers, dystocia) and longer periods, as well as to include other anomalies in dairy cattle (e.g., heat stress, lameness).…”
Section: Influence Of the Detection Time Intervalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the lifetime of the monitory system should match the animal's lifetime. Recently, research has been performed on the potential of wireless power transfer to power the sensors' batteries during short amounts of times when the cows are drinking or are being milked (Minnaert et al, 2018). A follow-up study with a larger sample size is required to validate the findings from this paper from a relatively limited set of cows and to consider different conditions (e.g., heifers, dystocia) and longer periods, as well as to include other anomalies in dairy cattle (e.g., heat stress, lameness).…”
Section: Influence Of the Detection Time Intervalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinguishing cattle foraging activities using accelerometry-based activity monitors is widely reported in the literature. For example, grazing behavior [46], lying, standing or walking [47], walking and standing [48], lying time and frequency of lying bouts [49], lying behavior [50], grazing, rest, travel [51]. In [52], an in-depth study of wireless sensor networks applied to the monitoring of animal behavior in the field is described.…”
Section: Foraging Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has gained global acceptance, and is used to supply the power for many applications in several fields, such as electric vehicles (EVs) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], online electric vehicles (OLEVs) [15][16][17], plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEVs) [18], superconducting magnetic levitation trains (maglev) [19], implantable medical devices (IMDs) [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], and consumer electronics [32][33][34]. In addition, it has been used in the charging systems of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) [35], the rotary of a gas turbine [36], and Internet of Things (IoT) applications [37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%