2018
DOI: 10.1109/tcpmt.2018.2794540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wire Defect Recognition of Spring-Wire Socket Using Multitask Convolutional Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On a coarse-grained dataset, Taylor L et al used six data augmentation methods that include clipping, rotation, flipping, color jittering, edge enhancement, and fancy Principal Components Analysis (PCA) [ 22 ]. For wire defect recognition, Tao X et al investigated four data augmentation methods, and rotation was deemed most effective method [ 23 ]. On Common Objects in Context (MS COCO) dataset, Kisantal M et al proposed a data augmentation method to improve the accuracy by oversampling images with small objects [ 25 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On a coarse-grained dataset, Taylor L et al used six data augmentation methods that include clipping, rotation, flipping, color jittering, edge enhancement, and fancy Principal Components Analysis (PCA) [ 22 ]. For wire defect recognition, Tao X et al investigated four data augmentation methods, and rotation was deemed most effective method [ 23 ]. On Common Objects in Context (MS COCO) dataset, Kisantal M et al proposed a data augmentation method to improve the accuracy by oversampling images with small objects [ 25 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is proved to benefit the model in generalization ability and robustness [ 20 ]. By various data augmentation methods on images, such as random cropping, rotation, radiation transformation, and Gaussian noise, the limited samples are more fully used to train better models for practices [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. Furthermore, the best data augmentation strategy is dataset-specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep-learning technology has developed rapidly and made great success in object detection [ 61 ], intelligent robot [ 62 ], saliency detection [ 63 ], parking garage sound event detection [ 64 ], sound event detection for smart city safety [ 65 , 66 ], UAV blade fault diagnosis [ 67 , 68 , 69 ] and other fields [ 70 , 71 , 72 ]. Deep learning has a kind of deep neural network structure with multiple convolutions layer.…”
Section: Survey Of Deep-learning Defect-detection Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning has a kind of deep neural network structure with multiple convolutions layer. By combining low-level features to form a more abstract high-level representation of attribute categories or features, the data can be better reached in abstract ways such as edge and shape to improve the effectiveness of the deep-learning algorithm [ 70 ], Therefore, many researchers try to use deep-learning technology to defect detection of product and improved the product quality [ 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 ]. Table 2 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of deep-learning methods commonly used in product defect detection.…”
Section: Survey Of Deep-learning Defect-detection Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They established a convolutional neural network to extract defect features from a suspicious area and, finally, the accuracy of detection was more than 96% [21]. S. Nahavand et al used intelligent algorithms to detect defects on a metal surface [22]; Xian Tao et al developed a machine vision device to detect defects on an electrical connector using convolutional neural networks, and they discussed the effects of data augmentation on defect recognition [23]; Yuan et al used a modified segmentation method and deep neural networks to detect defects on the cover glass of mobile phones, and used GAN to generate new data in order to overcome the drawbacks presented when a huge amount of data is unavailable [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%