1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.1997.tb00158.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winter mortality of young‐of‐the‐year pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca)

Abstract: Abstract— The wintering success of young‐of‐the‐year pikeperches (Stizostedion lucioperca) was examined in the laboratory during the winter of 1993‐1994. From September to November half the fishes were offered artificial fishfood; the others received plankton with river water. Pikeperch did not eat the fishfood properly, and poorer condition of the smallest fish fed artificially was reflected in a lower amount of lipid in the whole fish at the beginning of the experiment in November. The autumnal diet played a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Piscivory by 0+ pikeperch and their consequently larger size probably has a positive effect on their survival (Buijse & Houthuijzen 1992). In a laboratory trial made by Kirjasniemi & Valtonen (1997), the overwinter survival of 0+ pikeperch was positively correlated with length. Size‐dependent overwinter survival of 0+ pikeperch has also been detected by comparing length frequency distributions of fish in autumn and the following spring in the Baltic Sea (Lappalainen, Erm, Kjellman & Lehtonen 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Piscivory by 0+ pikeperch and their consequently larger size probably has a positive effect on their survival (Buijse & Houthuijzen 1992). In a laboratory trial made by Kirjasniemi & Valtonen (1997), the overwinter survival of 0+ pikeperch was positively correlated with length. Size‐dependent overwinter survival of 0+ pikeperch has also been detected by comparing length frequency distributions of fish in autumn and the following spring in the Baltic Sea (Lappalainen, Erm, Kjellman & Lehtonen 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, winter mortality may still be present in species that are able to feed under winter conditions if winter resource levels are low, but could be either negatively‐, positively‐ or non‐ size‐dependent based on the complex interactions between foraging rate, metabolism and stored energy reserves. Correspondingly, fish such as walleye ( Sander vitreus ) and pike perch ( Sander lucioperca ), which have been shown to be able to feed during winter, also show large variation between systems in size‐dependent winter mortality (Toneys and Coble 1979, Madenjian et al 1996, Kirjasniemi and Valtonen 1997a, Copeland and Carline 1998, Pratt and Fox 2002). Nevertheless, strong evidence for negative size‐dependent winter mortality has been found in lake living rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ), which have experimentally been shown to have the capacity to feed during winter (Connolly and Petersen 2003, Biro et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is probably the prolonged growth season for YOY pike-perch, allowing them to begin feeding on fish (46), and thus to grow rapidly and store fat before winter. Also as a larger predator they are able to find more food during winter which increases the chances of survival (15,47,48). Furthermore, their close relative, perch, shows strong year-classes after warm summers when the YOY has grown well (49,50).…”
Section: Recruitment and Summer Temperaturementioning
confidence: 97%