1985
DOI: 10.1086/163062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winds in central stars of planetary nebulae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
55
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…that a similar mechanism, i.e., self-shocking winds, might be producing the point-like X-ray emission from many, perhaps most, CSPNe. This is further supported by the fact that during the high-luminosity phase of post-AGB evolution, where a majority of our detections are made, stellar winds are strongest and subsequently fade after the temperature of the central star has peaked (Cerruti-Sola & Perinotto 1985). Further evidence for self-shocking winds comes from UV spectroscopy where CSPNe with variable P Cygni profiles are observed with high ionization potential ions (e.g., O vi) despite low effective temperatures, which is interpreted as Auger ionization from X-ray emission due to shocks in their stellar winds (Guerrero & De Marco 2013).…”
Section: Tracing the Origin Of X-ray Emitting Cspnesupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…that a similar mechanism, i.e., self-shocking winds, might be producing the point-like X-ray emission from many, perhaps most, CSPNe. This is further supported by the fact that during the high-luminosity phase of post-AGB evolution, where a majority of our detections are made, stellar winds are strongest and subsequently fade after the temperature of the central star has peaked (Cerruti-Sola & Perinotto 1985). Further evidence for self-shocking winds comes from UV spectroscopy where CSPNe with variable P Cygni profiles are observed with high ionization potential ions (e.g., O vi) despite low effective temperatures, which is interpreted as Auger ionization from X-ray emission due to shocks in their stellar winds (Guerrero & De Marco 2013).…”
Section: Tracing the Origin Of X-ray Emitting Cspnesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Source of supplementary CSPNe properties and adopted X-ray spectral model are discussed in Section 3. a Binary notation scheme: "c"-close binary, "w"-wide binary, "y"-binary with unknown period, "o"-an optical pair; additionally, we indicate suspected binarity by placing the binary indicator within parentheses. b Stellar wind notation is from Cerruti-Sola & Perinotto (1985): "y"-P Cygni profiles were detected, "n"-no P Cygni profiles were detected and the stellar photosphere is detected, ":"-the observation is not sensitive to the photosphere, "-"-no UV satellite observations are present. c Adopted model: 1-N H determined from c Hβ (fixed-N H model); 2-N H determined from spectral fit (free-N H model).…”
Section: Hot Pg1159-type Cspnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near the time when the hot stellar core is exposed, the slow AGB wind, with terminal velocities 5-30 km s −1 (Eder et al 1988), is superseded by a fast stellar wind with terminal velocities 1,000-4,000 km s −1 (Cerruti-Sola & Perinotto 1985;Guerrero et al 2010). This fast stellar wind sweeps up the slower AGB wind to form a PN (Kwok 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the mass loss from the central star is driven by radiation pressure on resonance lines (Pauldrach et al 1988), then the terminal velocities are expected to be proportional to the escape velocities (Abbott 1978), which increase as the central stars evolve to higher temperatures at constant luminosities. It is estimated that approximately half of the PN central stars surveyed show evidence of fast winds (Cerruti-Sola and Perinotto 1985), suggesting that this is a common property. Figure 7 shows a schematic diagram of a PN system.…”
Section: Dynamical Energy Input From the Central Starmentioning
confidence: 99%