2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/142/3/91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Structure of the Planetary Nebula NGC 3242 From the Hot Bubble to the Nebular Envelope

Abstract: One key feature of the interacting stellar winds model of the formation of planetary nebulae (PNe) is the presence of shock-heated stellar wind confined in the central cavities of PNe. This so-called hot bubble should be detectable in X-rays. Here we present XMM-Newton observations of NGC 3242, a multiple-shell PN whose shell morphology is consistent with the interacting stellar winds model. Diffuse X-ray emission is detected within its inner shell with a plasma temperature ∼2.35×10 6 K and an intrinsic X-ray … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same model can give a limb-brightened or flat surface brightness profile depending on the FWHM of the Gaussian profile of the PSF. Indeed, observations of the same object with XMM-Newton and Chandra can give different radial surface brightness profiles, such as is the case with NGC 3242 (see Ruiz et al 2011,Kastner et al 2012. This is because the PSF of the EPIC XMM-Newton X-ray detectors is not able to resolve structures with the same level of detail as the back-illuminated ACIS-S CCD3 of the Chandra telescope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same model can give a limb-brightened or flat surface brightness profile depending on the FWHM of the Gaussian profile of the PSF. Indeed, observations of the same object with XMM-Newton and Chandra can give different radial surface brightness profiles, such as is the case with NGC 3242 (see Ruiz et al 2011,Kastner et al 2012. This is because the PSF of the EPIC XMM-Newton X-ray detectors is not able to resolve structures with the same level of detail as the back-illuminated ACIS-S CCD3 of the Chandra telescope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However in this context, it may be worth pointing out that the presence of a system of concentric rings, whose brightness is higher in the mid-IR than in the optical, located in an extended halo around the source, has been recently reported by Phillips et al (2009). Furthermore, from the analysis of its HST images, Ruiz et al (2011) modelled its Hα brightness spatial distribution as a thin shell with a constant density embedded within an outer shell, characterized by a radial density profile much shallower than the classical profile for a free-expanding wind at a constant massloss rate (r −2 ). This is in agreement with our dust modelling for NGC 3242, whose density profile is less steep than that of the other PNe.…”
Section: Physical Properties Of the Source Samplementioning
confidence: 84%
“…In an XMM observation ( Figure 4, upper left), NGC 3242 (the Ghost of Jupiter nebula) is well detected and appears as a marginally extended, asymmetric X-ray source (Ruiz et al 2011). However, as in the cases of NGC 2392 (Guerrero et al 2005) and 7009 (Guerrero et al 2002), the diameter of the inner nebula of NGC 3242 is similar to the width of the XMM/EPIC (pn and MOS) point spread functions, rendering its XMM X-ray morphology difficult to interpret and (in particular) the potential contribution from an X-ray-luminous CSPN impossible to ascertain.…”
Section: Bd+30mentioning
confidence: 99%