2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Windowed detrended cross-correlation analysis of synchronization processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard deviation and α-scaling were determined for SSDyn time series. In addition, and to further understand the nature of the synchronization, we have determined the Windowed Detrended Cross Correlation function (WDCC) according to Roume et al [35]. WDCC was calculated from lag −10 to lag +10, between ASYN and ST time series for each stimuli condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The standard deviation and α-scaling were determined for SSDyn time series. In addition, and to further understand the nature of the synchronization, we have determined the Windowed Detrended Cross Correlation function (WDCC) according to Roume et al [35]. WDCC was calculated from lag −10 to lag +10, between ASYN and ST time series for each stimuli condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the short-term processes. As recently proposed [35] the WDCC function should be considered as a pattern. Here we observed an overall identical pattern between conditions suggesting similar local dynamics regardless of the stimulus temporal structure.…”
Section: Compensatory Strategies Are Not Driven By the Structure Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almurad et al (2017) and Roume et al (2018) proposed another method, the Windowed detrended cross-correlation analysis (WDCC), based on the analysis of cross-correlations between the series produced by the two systems. In this method, the series is divided into short intervals of 15 data points, detrended within each interval, and the cross-correlation function, from lag −10 to lag 10, is computed within each interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Windowed detrended cross-correlation analysis allows distinguishing complexity matching from synchronization processes based on discrete asynchronies corrections: in the first case the cross-correlation function presents a positive peak at lag 0, whereas in the second case one obtains positive peaks at lags −1 and 1, and a negative peak at lag 0 (Konvalinka et al, 2010; Almurad et al, 2017; Roume et al, 2018). Additionally, complexity matching seems characterized by quite moderate levels of lag 0 cross-correlation, in contrast with those expected in continuous coupling models (Delignières and Marmelat, 2014; Coey et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to these two theories, our model, inspired by the strong anticipation hypothesis, offers a different explanation based on a dynamical systems approach where the properties of the model and its interaction with the external stimulus and surrounding active systems are mathematically described as constrained by universal physical laws [27]. Stephen and Dixon [55] have described that strong anticipation can happen at local and global temporal scales, where local strong anticipation occurs between systems continuously coupled and global strong anticipation is more complex, involving multi-scale interactions (see [5657] for a thorough discussion of global vs local strong anticipation). The SAPPA model is a clear example of local strong anticipation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%