12th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2018) 2018
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2018.0380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Window and wall penetration loss on-site measurements with three methods

Abstract: Three methods suitable for on-site window and wall penetration loss measurements are presented and compared. The methods are (i) outdoor-to-indoor channel measurement, (ii) far-field penetration loss measurement, and (iii) near-field penetration loss measurement. It is shown that the different methods give similar penetration loss results. The measured window exhibits bandstop characteristics due to the internal reflections in the periodic structure of the triple-layer window. The brick wall has penetration lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some measurement results of the PLs of windows with double-glazed glass panes, it was reported that the PL did not increase linearly with increasing frequency; in spite of the different thicknesses and relative dielectric constants of the glass panes, similar oscillatory characteristics were observed, with high losses at 5 GHz and low losses at 10 GHz [7], [14], [18], [19]. These characteristics are due to the frequency dependence of an input impedance at the air-to-dielectrics interface [14] or to multiple internal reflective effects [12], [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In some measurement results of the PLs of windows with double-glazed glass panes, it was reported that the PL did not increase linearly with increasing frequency; in spite of the different thicknesses and relative dielectric constants of the glass panes, similar oscillatory characteristics were observed, with high losses at 5 GHz and low losses at 10 GHz [7], [14], [18], [19]. These characteristics are due to the frequency dependence of an input impedance at the air-to-dielectrics interface [14] or to multiple internal reflective effects [12], [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In general, two methods are used to measure a penetration loss (PL) of a material: anechoic chamber measurements [4], [9], [11] and on-site measurements [3], [7], [12]. Usually, in a non-reflection chamber, the effects of reflections on measurements can be eliminating, allowing more accurate measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Polymers, typically used as matrix in composites, incur low electromagnetic attenuation in terms of dielectric loss-especially for frequencies below the gigahertz-regime. For the higher frequencies, already the type and grade of the polymer blend must be well optimized [25,26]. Reinforcing fibers are generally not especially advantageous in terms of signal penetration-carbon fibers and all conductive fibers lead to very high attenuation.…”
Section: The Advantages and Sustainability Of Composite Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O2I coverage is the bridge between mmWave outdoor and indoor cellular networks and whose performance can be evaluated via isolated material penetration loss measurements or on-site cellular-type building entry loss (BEL) measurements [23]. Far-field penetration loss measurements are generally conducted using two identical narrow beamwidth horn antennas with the material under test (MUT) located perpendicular to the transmitter-receiver (T-R) boresight, wherein the distance between the MUT and each antenna must be larger than the far field distance [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%