2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2013.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind tunnel tests on macro-porous structural elements: A scaling procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3), the values of the wind action are calculated as structural elements (section 7.7, EN1991-1-4 (9)). The results of these methods are very similar to the research results presented in (10), (11), (12) and (13).…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…3), the values of the wind action are calculated as structural elements (section 7.7, EN1991-1-4 (9)). The results of these methods are very similar to the research results presented in (10), (11), (12) and (13).…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Much more recently, Lopez et al [40] developed more advanced models that allow to estimate K p from the two-dimensional porosity and the diameter of the threads; and Y from the diameter of the threads and the diameter of the inner circumference of the pore. Wind tunnel measurements and CFD numerical modelling has been also a support in other investigations to achieve better characterisations [43] or to identify key parameters (pressure loss coefficient, drag coefficient and tunnel experiments [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Packwood [1] et al Demonstrated the applicability of the numerical simulation method in the calculation of porous windbreak by comparing the simulation of wind tunnel tests and CFD. Davide AL Lori [2] et al Studied the wind-resistant performance of the windbreaks by wind-tunnel tests using a scaled-down model. Dong Xiang-ting [3] et al used numerical simulation method studying the influence of windbreak on the safety of trains under cross-wind, proving that reasonable windbreak design can obviously improve the running safety of trains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%