2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind tunnel study of wind effects on a high-rise building at a scale of 1:300

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trend of the mean base bending moment coefficients are similar among the studies compared, and the C ¯ Mx and C ¯ My values, the latter from 0° to 90° and the former from 0° to 45°, obtained in this study are similar to those reported by Melbourne (1980). The higher magnitude of differences between the C ¯ My values are associated with wind directions greater than 45°, and the C ¯ My values obtained in this study are slightly higher than those reported by Melbourne (1980) and smaller than those reported by Sheng et al (2018). The scattering of results observed in Figure 10 could be caused using different criteria during the wind tunnel tests, primarily turbulence intensity ranges and the measurement of the wind speed reference, as described by Goliger and Milford (1988).…”
Section: Methodology and Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The trend of the mean base bending moment coefficients are similar among the studies compared, and the C ¯ Mx and C ¯ My values, the latter from 0° to 90° and the former from 0° to 45°, obtained in this study are similar to those reported by Melbourne (1980). The higher magnitude of differences between the C ¯ My values are associated with wind directions greater than 45°, and the C ¯ My values obtained in this study are slightly higher than those reported by Melbourne (1980) and smaller than those reported by Sheng et al (2018). The scattering of results observed in Figure 10 could be caused using different criteria during the wind tunnel tests, primarily turbulence intensity ranges and the measurement of the wind speed reference, as described by Goliger and Milford (1988).…”
Section: Methodology and Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The maximum value of C ¯ Mx also occurs at 0° within the range of −0.55 to −0.62 for all models tested, while the maximum value of C ¯ My varies between 0.44 and 0.55, at wind directions from 60° to 75°. Figure 10 presents a comparison between the mean base bending moment coefficients for model M1 and those obtained by Melbourne (1980) and Sheng et al (2018). The model studied by Melbourne (1980) consisted of a rectangular cross section with a side ratio of 1.5 and an aspect ratio of 6, while the model studied by Sheng et al (2018) was square in plan with a side ratio of 1.0 and an aspect ratio of 5.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More than 70 % of the tests utilize this kind of multicomponent force and moment measure instrumentations to estimate aerodynamic loads [1]. With today's increasing requirements of aerodynamic experiments for aerospace vehicles, ground vehicles, modern and unique architectures, etc., customers are concerned much more about the performance of the wind tunnel force measurements [2]- [5]. Therefore, wind tunnel balance developing technology has been focused and promoted for more than 100 years to achieve higher accuracy of steady and fluctuating force measurements [6]- [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there is a good potential of harvesting energy from wind at high rise building areas (Glumac et al, 2018). In fact, build spacing and high rise buildings in the urban area cause to flow strong wind at base (pedestrian level at the ground) and also at the top of the buildings (Blocken and Stathopoulos, 2013;Blocken et al, 2016;Ricci et al, 2018;Sheng et al, 2018;Stathopoulos, 1985;Zheng et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%