42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2004
DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-1188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind Tunnel Aerodynamic Tests of Six Airfoils for Use on Small Wind Turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results are compared with the University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign wind tunnel measurements by Selig and McGranahan. The chord Reynolds number for the present simulations was Re = 100, 000, which corresponds to a wind speed of 4.5 m s −1 . Unless indicated otherwise, all length scales and velocities were made dimensionless with the airfoil chord, c , and the approach flow velocity, u R .…”
Section: Blade Section Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simulation results are compared with the University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign wind tunnel measurements by Selig and McGranahan. The chord Reynolds number for the present simulations was Re = 100, 000, which corresponds to a wind speed of 4.5 m s −1 . Unless indicated otherwise, all length scales and velocities were made dimensionless with the airfoil chord, c , and the approach flow velocity, u R .…”
Section: Blade Section Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…For these conditions, laminar separation was observed in wind tunnel experiments at the University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign. As a reference and to allow for a comparison with the fixed airfoil wind tunnel experiments, a stationary non‐rotating blade section was considered first. Simulations were also carried out for blade sections at 20% and 80% blade radius.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As detailed in Ref. 25, the turbulence intensity of the wind tunnel was measured to be less than 0.1%.…”
Section: A Facilitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Airfoil self noise has been extensively studied using computational methods and wind tunnel experimental measurements in Bertagnolio et al , Lutz et al and Selig and McGranahan. In some cases, inflow turbulence noise has been measured by installing a grid in the wind tunnel to create turbulence; however, turbulence‐generated sound levels depend on the atmospheric turbulence levels in the incoming flow that may be much lower than turbulence intensities produced in the wind tunnel. Also, the atmospheric turbulence spectral distribution may be difficult to reproduce experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%