2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2012.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind-induced dynamics and loads in a prismatic slender building: A modal approach based on unsteady pressure measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained CFD simulation provides a large amount of model flow data: velocity distributions, static and dynamic pressures, particle trajectory, age of the air, and other parameters. For example, the wind pressure coefficient for the enclosures allows differentiation between areas subjected to pressure and suction effects as a result of wind action and then obtaining their Pascal values [46,47]. Generally speaking, we consider pressure gradients between −0.03 and 11.64 Pa for windward enclosures and between −2.85 and −5.69 Pa for leeward (Table 4).…”
Section: Results In An Isolated Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained CFD simulation provides a large amount of model flow data: velocity distributions, static and dynamic pressures, particle trajectory, age of the air, and other parameters. For example, the wind pressure coefficient for the enclosures allows differentiation between areas subjected to pressure and suction effects as a result of wind action and then obtaining their Pascal values [46,47]. Generally speaking, we consider pressure gradients between −0.03 and 11.64 Pa for windward enclosures and between −2.85 and −5.69 Pa for leeward (Table 4).…”
Section: Results In An Isolated Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Rosa et al (2012) measured the surface pressure of a 1:100 scale static rigid building model in the wind tunnel, and then applied numerical modal analysis to evaluate the dynamics of the building. The major difference from their study is that here wind loads are obtained via a "numerical wind tunnel" using purely CFD techniques.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Damping and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very often, for the presence of spire or for very spindly parts at the top, the total height reduction (Δℎ tot ) is observed in many constructions. The reduction of height is the difference between the top height ( ) and the height of the ultimate occupied floor ( In case of high geometrical slenderness [36], the classic problems due to the wind load could add up to those caused by dynamic effects, like the galloping due to the vortex shedding. In tall buildings, these effects are particularly dangerous since they concern the resistance of both the main structural elements and the elements supported by the main structure (e.g., the steel connections of the facades).…”
Section: Slenderness Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, in this case, "Approach 1" is followed and the site directional velocities come out from an in-depth study of the location site [41]. The different velocities are reproduced in the wind tunnel on a rigid scale models (1 : 100) [36,42]. The tests have investigated two different layouts, with urban contest and without the urban contest.…”
Section: Wind Tunnel Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%