2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2022.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Will the use of solid fuels reduce the life satisfaction of rural residents—Evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of coal, wood, and other non-clean fuels will reduce residents’ life satisfaction by affecting their physical health [ 3 ]. Atmospheric pollution from combustion, such as PM2.5 and sulfur dioxide, increases the likelihood that groups exposed to high pollution environments and poor health conditions will fall into the environment–health–poverty trap [ 4 ] and reduce their personal well-being [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of coal, wood, and other non-clean fuels will reduce residents’ life satisfaction by affecting their physical health [ 3 ]. Atmospheric pollution from combustion, such as PM2.5 and sulfur dioxide, increases the likelihood that groups exposed to high pollution environments and poor health conditions will fall into the environment–health–poverty trap [ 4 ] and reduce their personal well-being [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Livelihood strategies may also be used to address specific short-term and long-term needs. The use of alternative fuels, such as wood, biomass, or other solid fuels, is a common seasonal and short-term livelihood strategy used to address energy poverty [28,[46][47][48]. Cost reduction through energy conservation or even under-use is widespread [26,49].…”
Section: Livelihood Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, strategies such as mining and unsustainable agricultural practices may not affect poverty or may even increase it [25,45]. Short-term strategies such as solid fuel use can negatively affect air quality, cause burns and injuries, and ultimately affect mental and physical health and life satisfaction [28,47,48]. Thus, not all livelihood outcomes are equal with respect to their effect on poverty.…”
Section: Livelihood Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few other national-level studies, predominantly from China, have focussed on subjective wellbeing and specific segments of the population, such as the elderly [36,37], finding that the adoption of clean cooking fuels significantly enhances middle-aged and senior peoples' subjective life satisfaction, or rural residents [38] whose life satisfaction is found to negatively correlate with solid fuel use. LPG is found to support dimensions of wellbeing; however, fuel transitions are complex, multi-dimensional, and dependent on context [19].…”
Section: Background To Clean Cooking and Wellbeingmentioning
confidence: 99%