2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Will the consumption tax on sugar-sweetened beverages help promote healthy beverage consumption? Evidence from urban China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, diet CSD products (with an average price elasticity of −3.860) are found to be more price sensitive than regular CSD products (with an average price elasticity of −3.147). Zhai et al (2022) estimated subcategory‐level price elasticities of regular and diet sugar‐sweetened beverages in China based on a quadratic almost ideal demand system (QUAIDS) model, in which they also reported a higher price elasticity for diet beverages compared with regular beverages among Chinese consumers at the aggregated subcategory level. Compared with brand‐level price elasticities for CSD products in the US market, the magnitudes of estimated own‐price elasticities in China's market are slightly less (Dhar et al, 2005; Liu, Lopez, et al, 2014; Zhen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On average, diet CSD products (with an average price elasticity of −3.860) are found to be more price sensitive than regular CSD products (with an average price elasticity of −3.147). Zhai et al (2022) estimated subcategory‐level price elasticities of regular and diet sugar‐sweetened beverages in China based on a quadratic almost ideal demand system (QUAIDS) model, in which they also reported a higher price elasticity for diet beverages compared with regular beverages among Chinese consumers at the aggregated subcategory level. Compared with brand‐level price elasticities for CSD products in the US market, the magnitudes of estimated own‐price elasticities in China's market are slightly less (Dhar et al, 2005; Liu, Lopez, et al, 2014; Zhen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, the per capita annual intake of sugar was approximately 19.6 kg in 2008, and the State Council aims to reduce that number to 9.125 kg (or less than 25 g/day) by 2030 (National Health Commission, 2019). Zhai et al (2022) reported that an additional 20%–40% consumption tax on sugar‐sweetened beverages could effectively lower the sugar intake of Chinese consumers. Our simulation results demonstrate that nutrition labeling could be an alternative policy tool for sugar reduction, especially when the sugar content is explicitly disclosed in nutrition labels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, considering that a sugary beverage tax, one of the most cost-effective public health strategies, is a common price instrument used in several countries to tackle obesity [ 39 , 40 ], it may also be one of the intervention policies to tackle rising sugary beverage consumption in China in the future. It has been argued that a tax on sugary beverages would induce a shift in the consumption of sugary beverages to sugar-free or low-sugar beverages among the population [ 41 , 42 ]. Then, with the gradual increase in income levels and nutritional health awareness of the population, coupled with the sugary beverage tax, we can imagine that the consumption of sugary beverages by the population will further decrease significantly, thus accelerating the change in the beverage consumption market pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industrialization and urbanization are still in progress for many emerging economies, which seems to inevitably contribute to the pollution problem. Unlike consumption tax and corporate tax [ 1 , 2 , 3 ], environmental tax is widely used to control environmental pollution [ 4 ] as one of the market-based tools. However, there are some differences in the contents of environmental tax due to the different patterns of economic development in different countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%