Will o’the Wisp: Augmented Reality Navigation for Hikers

Johnson, Catherine S.; Mahajan, S.; Ordu, Mehmet; Sherugar, Samyukta Manjayya; Walker, Bruce N.

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40542-1_60

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A somewhat different approach to hiking support is presented by Posti et al (2014), where the authors describe their Hobbit 'asocial hiking app' which was designed to provide navigation support that "enables solitary hiking by informing the user of approaching people" (Posti et al, 2014). An example of non-screen navigation support through an augmented hiking stick is presented in (Johnson et al, 2016).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reflections on the NatureCHI Workshop Series

Häkkilä

Bidwell

Cheverst

et al. 2018

International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Being in nature is often regarded to be calming, relaxing and purifying. While technology has the potential to support engagement with nature, developing systems that provide support in an unobtrusive manner holds many challenges for interaction design. In this article, the authors describe their reflections around the NatureCHI workshop series. The aim with the workshops has been to help foster a research community interested in the design of Unobtrusive User Experiences with Technology in Nature. The first of two workshops ran as part of CHI 2016 in San Jose, California, while the second workshop took place alongside MobileHCI 2017 in Vienna, Austria. With 25 papers presented in total, the workshops demonstrate a rising interest in the areas where nature and interactive technologies meet.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reflections on the NatureCHI Workshop Series

Häkkilä

Bidwell

Cheverst

et al. 2018

International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Research and Practice Recommendations for Mixed Reality Design – Different Perspectives from the Community

Krauß

Jasche

Saßmannshausen

et al. 2021

Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last decades, different kinds of design guides have been created to maintain consistency and usability in interactive system development. However, in the case of spatial applications, practitioners from research and industry either have difficulty finding them or perceive such guides as lacking relevance, practicability, and applicability. This paper presents the current state of scientific research and industry practice by investigating currently used design recommendations for mixed reality (MR) system development. We analyzed and compared 875 design recommendations for MR applications elicited from 89 scientific papers and documentation from six industry practitioners in a literature review. In doing so, we identified differences regarding four key topics: Focus on unique MR design challenges, abstraction regarding devices and ecosystems, level of detail and abstraction of content, and covered topics. Based on that, we contribute to the MR design research by providing three factors for perceived irrelevance and six main implications for design recommendations that are applicable in scientific and industry practice. CCS CONCEPTS• Human-centered computing → User interface design; Mixed / augmented reality.

show abstract

Will o’the Wisp: Augmented Reality Navigation for Hikers

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

Reflections on the NatureCHI Workshop Series

Reflections on the NatureCHI Workshop Series

Research and Practice Recommendations for Mixed Reality Design – Different Perspectives from the Community

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About