2003
DOI: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Will haplotype maps be useful for finding genes?

Abstract: From its introduction into the literature, the idea of haplotype map-based linkage disequilibrium (LD) studies has been the subject of disputes. These queries involve the extent to which the haplotype blocks exist, the validity of fundamental concepts such as the recombination hotspot, and the application of this idea in the form of the HapMap project. In this article, we review the relevant literature to evaluate the potential importance of haplotype maps for psychiatric genetics. We first take a closer look … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the HapMap was designed to identify more common disease-causing variants based upon the "common disease, common variant" hypothesis, which suggests that genetic influences on many common diseases are attributable to a limited number of allelic variants (one or a few at each major disease locus) that are present in more than 1%-5% of the population (10)(11)(12). Evidence supporting this hypothesis was modest at the outset of the HapMap Project, and reliance on the hypothesis sparked considerable controversy (13)(14)(15)(16). Understanding how that controversy played out and was ultimately resolved by the remarkable success of the genetic association studies enabled by the HapMap requires an understanding of genetic variation, population genetics, and the evolution of the HapMap itself.…”
Section: Genetic Influences On Common Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the HapMap was designed to identify more common disease-causing variants based upon the "common disease, common variant" hypothesis, which suggests that genetic influences on many common diseases are attributable to a limited number of allelic variants (one or a few at each major disease locus) that are present in more than 1%-5% of the population (10)(11)(12). Evidence supporting this hypothesis was modest at the outset of the HapMap Project, and reliance on the hypothesis sparked considerable controversy (13)(14)(15)(16). Understanding how that controversy played out and was ultimately resolved by the remarkable success of the genetic association studies enabled by the HapMap requires an understanding of genetic variation, population genetics, and the evolution of the HapMap itself.…”
Section: Genetic Influences On Common Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unlikely that blocks represent discrete entities with clear cut boundaries since the size of conserved ancestral haplotypes in a given region may differ. 46 Variability in size of conserved haplotypes is clearly recognised in the MHC, 28 and long-range LD beyond the confines of blocks has been observed in this region. 47 As a consequence, the boundaries of haplotype blocks are likely to depend on the relative frequency of the various ancestral and recombinant haplotypes.…”
Section: Hla Haplotype Specific Ld In the Xmhcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 As a consequence, the boundaries of haplotype blocks are likely to depend on the relative frequency of the various ancestral and recombinant haplotypes. 46 This may have practical implications, as a disease association sometimes is restricted to a defined LD block. Caution should be taken when employing blocks in fine mapping as the block boundaries are not fixed and will shift depending on various parameters including the HLA background.…”
Section: Hla Haplotype Specific Ld In the Xmhcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'htSNPs' were then selected within each 'LD block' for 90% haplotype coverage using SNPtagger software (Ke and Cardon, 2003). This strategy for association analyses after initial LD mapping and 'htSNPs' selection is considered to be reasonable on the basis of descriptions given in other papers (Kamatani et al, 2004;van den Oord and Neale, 2004).…”
Section: Selection Of 'Htsnps'mentioning
confidence: 99%