Genome-wide association studies have identified hundreds of genetic variants associated with complex human diseases and traits, and have provided valuable insights into their genetic architecture. Most variants identified so far confer relatively small increments in risk, and explain only a small proportion of familial clustering, leading many to question how the remaining, 'missing' heritability can be explained. Here we examine potential sources of missing heritability and propose research strategies, including and extending beyond current genome-wide association approaches, to illuminate the genetics of complex diseases and enhance its potential to enable effective disease prevention or treatment.Many common human diseases and traits are known to cluster in families and are believed to be influenced by several genetic and environmental factors, but until recently the identification of genetic variants contributing to these 'complex diseases' has been slow and arduous 1 . Genome-wide association studies (GWAS), in which several hundred thousand to more than a million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are assayed in thousands of individuals, represent a powerful new tool for investigating the genetic architecture of complex diseases 1, 2. In the past few years, these studies have identified hundreds of genetic variants associated with such conditions and have provided valuable insights into the complexities of their genetic architecture3 , 4.The genome-wide association (GWA) method represents an important advance compared to 'candidate gene' studies, in which sample sizes are generally smaller and the variants assayed are limited to a selected few, often on the basis of imperfect understanding of biological pathways and often yielding associations that are difficult to replicate 5,6. GWAS are also an important step beyond family-based linkage studies, in which inheritance patterns are related to several hundreds to thousands of genomic markers. Despite many clear successes in singlegene 'Mendelian' disorders7 , 8, the limited success of linkage studies in complex diseases has been attributed to their low power and resolution for variants of modest effect 9-11 .The underlying rationale for GWAS is the 'common disease, common variant' hypothesis, positing that common diseases are attributable in part to allelic variants present in more than 1-5% of the population12 -14. They have been facilitated by the development of commercial 'SNP chips' or arrays that capture most, although not all, common variation in the genome. Although the allelic architecture of some conditions, notably age-related macular degeneration, for the most part reflects the contributions of several variants of large effect (defined loosely here as those increasing disease risk by twofold or more), most common variants individually or in combination confer relatively small increments in risk (1.1-1.5-fold) and explain only a small proportion of heritability-the portion of phenotypic variance in a population attributable to additive ...
Increases in the thickness of the intima and media of the carotid artery, as measured noninvasively by ultrasonography, are directly associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults without a history of cardiovascular disease.
The National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) Catalog of Published Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) Catalog provides a publicly available manually curated collection of published GWAS assaying at least 100 000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and all SNP-trait associations with P <1 × 10−5. The Catalog includes 1751 curated publications of 11 912 SNPs. In addition to the SNP-trait association data, the Catalog also publishes a quarterly diagram of all SNP-trait associations mapped to the SNPs’ chromosomal locations. The Catalog can be accessed via a tabular web interface, via a dynamic visualization on the human karyotype, as a downloadable tab-delimited file and as an OWL knowledge base. This article presents a number of recent improvements to the Catalog, including novel ways for users to interact with the Catalog and changes to the curation infrastructure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.