2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.05.003
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Will charophyte species increase or decrease their distribution in a changing climate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a dioecious species, the cost for each C. aspera shoot to develop its gametangia is lower – especially for male shoots – than for the monoecious C. hispida or N. hyalina , enabling a quicker and noticeable phenological response to small variations in the environmental drivers. Charophytes rapidly respond to changes in environmental conditions, but some species are more sensitive than others (Auderset Joye & Rey‐Boissezon, ). To a lesser extent, C. hispida also showed an autumn peak, but only for the production of gametangia and when growing in medium and deeper conditions in the LSP (Appendix S4), and in shallow conditions in the HSP (Figure b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a dioecious species, the cost for each C. aspera shoot to develop its gametangia is lower – especially for male shoots – than for the monoecious C. hispida or N. hyalina , enabling a quicker and noticeable phenological response to small variations in the environmental drivers. Charophytes rapidly respond to changes in environmental conditions, but some species are more sensitive than others (Auderset Joye & Rey‐Boissezon, ). To a lesser extent, C. hispida also showed an autumn peak, but only for the production of gametangia and when growing in medium and deeper conditions in the LSP (Appendix S4), and in shallow conditions in the HSP (Figure b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main threats for both habitats are eutrophication from agriculture, hydrological changes, and climate change. Related to this, predictions under future scenarios point to the presence of ‘loser’ and ‘winner’ charophyte species, based on their environmental preferences and the new suitability of the aquatic ecosystems (Auderset Joye & Rey‐Boissezon, ); however, not only niche specialization but also specific life‐history strategies and traits explain the commonness or rarity of charophytes (Baastrup‐Spohr, Iversen, Borum, & Sand‐Jensen, ). Their ability to adapt their life cycles to different ecological conditions will also determine charophyte resilience to climate change and, consequently, the future of these habitats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, many charophytes have become rare or even endangered in recent decades (Baastrup‐Spohr et al. ) and further changes are predicted in a changing climate (Auderset Joye and Rey‐Boissezon ). Accurate identification of charophyte species is, however, critical for understanding their diversity and for documenting changes in species distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have found evidence of species–environment relationships within macrophyte communities (Auderset Joye & Rey‐Boissezon, ; Baastrup‐Spohr, Iversen, Borum, & Sand‐Jensen, ; Chappuis, Gacia, & Ballesteros, ; Escobar, Qiao, Phelps, Wagner, & Larkin, ; Heegaard, Birks, Gibson, Smith, & Wolfe‐Murphy, ; Lambert‐Servien, Clemenceau, Gabory, Douillard, & Haury, ; Midwood, Darwin, Ho, Rokitnicki‐Wojcik, & Grabas, ; Rey‐Boissezon & Auderset Joye, ; Torn, Kovtun‐Kante, Herkül, Martin, & Mäemets, ; Wood, ). Rey‐Boissezon and Auderset Joye () used multivariate analyses with nine chemical and environmental factors across Switzerland to identify specialist and generalist species within the Characeae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%