Abstract1. Many freshwater systems receive substantial inputs of terrestrial organic matter.Terrestrially derived dissolved organic carbon (t-DOC) inputs can modify light availability, the spatial distribution of primary production, heat, and oxygen in aquatic systems, as well as inorganic nutrient bioavailability. It is also well-established that some terrestrial inputs (such as invertebrates and fruits) provide highquality food resources for consumers in some systems.2. In small to moderate-sized streams, leaf litter inputs average approximately three times greater than the autochthonous production. Conversely, in oligo/mesotrophic lakes algal production is typically five times greater than the available flux of allochthonous basal resources.3. Terrestrial particulate organic carbon (t-POC) inputs to lakes and rivers are comprised of 80%-90% biochemically recalcitrant lignocellulose, which is highly resistant to enzymatic breakdown by animal consumers. Further, t-POC and heterotrophic bacteria lack essential biochemical compounds that are critical for rapid growth and reproduction in aquatic invertebrates and fishes. Several studies have directly shown that these resources have very low food quality for herbivorous zooplankton and benthic invertebrates. 4.Much of the nitrogen assimilated by stream consumers is probably of algal origin, even in systems where there appears to be a significant terrestrial carbon contribution. Amino acid stable isotope analyses for large river food webs indicate that most upper trophic level essential amino acids are derived from algae. Similarly, profiles of essential fatty acids in consumers show a strong dependence on the algal food resources.5. Primary production to respiration ratios are not a meaningful index to assess consumer allochthony because respiration represents an oxidised carbon flux that cannot be utilised by animal consumers. Rather, the relative importance of allochthonous subsidies for upper trophic level production should be addressed by considering the rates at which terrestrial and autochthonous resources are consumed and the growth efficiency supported by this food.6. Ultimately, the biochemical composition of a particular basal resource, and not just its quantity or origin, determines how readily this material is incorporated into upper trophic level consumers. Because of its highly favourable biochemical composition and greater availability, we conclude that microalgal production supports most animal production in freshwater ecosystems. | WHY DOES ALLOCHTHONY MATTER?A better understanding of where and how allochthony modifies aquatic food web processes will improve our ability to predict how land-use and climate change affect organic carbon export from watersheds to lakes and rivers and how this matter influences upper trophic level production in aquatic systems. If invertebrate and fish consumers in rivers and lakes are strongly subsidised by allochthonous carbon inputs, then watersheds and especially riparian zone management will potentially have as mu...
1994. Zooplankton assemblages in the Ohio River: seasonal, tributary, and navigation dam effects. Can. 1. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51 : 1634-1 643.Ohio River zooplankton were collected monthly or quarterly for 1 yr from littoral and pelagic (main channel) areas in three navigation pools (constricted and floodplain) with four intrapool locations (lower pool and above, below, and within major tributaries). Total densities were minimal (1.64/L) when discharge and turbidities peaked (December-April) but were relatively high otherwise (21.63/L). Seasonal rises in rotifer density preceded increases in cladocerans and cspepods; rotifers were nearly twice as abundant as cladocesans and copepods. Diversity (species richness) was not correlated with temperature, velocity, or turbidity. Density was positively linked with temperature and negatively correlated with river velocity and turbidity. Diversities in littoral and pelagic areas were not different, but densities were higher nearshore (mostly copepods and cladocerans); rotifers were usually more common in the main channel. Neither proximity to low-head navigation dams nor channel morphology had detectable effects on zooplankton. Although total diversity and density were similar in tributaries and the main channel, rstifers were more abundant in tributaries, and the Ohio contained more cladocerans and copepods. Densities in the Ohio were greater below than above tributaries for rstifers and cladocerans but lower for copepsds, primarily because of nauplii.Le zooplancton de la riviere Ohio a fait B'objet de pr6levernents mensuels ou trimestriels pendant 1 an dans des regions Bittorales et pelagiques (chenal principalj dans trois bassins de navigatisn (etranglement et plaines inondables) avec quatre emplacements 2 l'interieur du bassin (bassin inferieur et au-dessus, en dessous et A l'interieur des principaux tributaires). Les densites totales sont minimales (I ,64/L) lsrsque le debit et la turbidite sont au maximum (decembre A avril), mais relativement elevees dans les autres cas (21,63/L). Les augmentations saissnnieres de la densite des rotiferes precedent les augmentations de la densite des cladoc&res et des copepodes. L'abondance des rotif&res est pr$s de deux fsis plus elevee que celle des cladoceres et des copepodes. Aucune corr4iation n'a ete sbservee entre la diversite (richesse des especes) et la temp&ature, la vitesse ou la turbidite. On a observe une correlation positive entre la densit6 et la temperature et une correlation negative entre la densite et la vitesse du cours d'eau et sa turbidite. Aucune difference n'a 6te observee sur B e plan de la diversite entre les regions fittorales et pelagiques; cependant, les densitks sont plus elevees prPs du rivage (pour l'essentiel, copkpodes et cIadocPresj. tes rotiferes sont en gknbral plus repandus dans le chenal principal. Ni la proximite des barrages de canalisation A faible hauteur de charge, ni la morphologie du chenal ne semblent avsir d'effet detectable sur le nsoplancton. Si I'sn a observi. des valeurs similaires pou...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.