2015
DOI: 10.1126/science.350.6263.920-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wildfires—Response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The logic behind the Wildfire Only scenario was that under "business-as-usual" wildfire suppression actions, where the worst 1-2% of wildfires that burn under extreme fire weather conditions evade suppression and account for the vast majority of area burned (Calkin et al, 2005;Cova et al, 2023). The remainder are typically suppressed (Calkin et al, 2015;North et al, 2015). For the Wildfire + Treatment scenario, management actions were assigned to restore climate adapted forest conditions and bolster resilience to wildfires.…”
Section: Management Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logic behind the Wildfire Only scenario was that under "business-as-usual" wildfire suppression actions, where the worst 1-2% of wildfires that burn under extreme fire weather conditions evade suppression and account for the vast majority of area burned (Calkin et al, 2005;Cova et al, 2023). The remainder are typically suppressed (Calkin et al, 2015;North et al, 2015). For the Wildfire + Treatment scenario, management actions were assigned to restore climate adapted forest conditions and bolster resilience to wildfires.…”
Section: Management Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%