DOI: 10.2969/aspm/01210287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wild Ramification in the Imperfect Residue Field Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, Hyodo [5, implies L = M(y 1/p ) with y = w where w is a unit of M and is a prime element of M. Hence, L/K t would be a non-abelian extension. This is a contradiction.…”
Section: Some Results On a Trace Mapmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Then, Hyodo [5, implies L = M(y 1/p ) with y = w where w is a unit of M and is a prime element of M. Hence, L/K t would be a non-abelian extension. This is a contradiction.…”
Section: Some Results On a Trace Mapmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Known results on the non-classical case include Kato's class field theory for "ndimensional complete discrete valuation fields," see [6] and [4]. In Zariski-Samuel [12, Vol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where both L and M are finite extensions of K. [Hy,). This is important for discussing examples in the subsequent sections.…”
Section: 2-23])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ( [Hy,]. If L/K is a Galois extension with the Galois group G, for any g ∈ G one defines the Artin and Swan ramification numbers by the formulas…”
Section: For Any Integral Scheme S K(s) Is the Field Of Rational Funmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation