The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1177/1461444809105356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wikinomics and its discontents: a critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos

Abstract: 'Collaborative culture', 'mass creativity' and 'co-creation' appear to be contagious buzzwords that are rapidly infecting economic and cultural discourse on Web 2.0. Allegedly, peer production models will replace opaque, top-down business models, yielding to transparent, democratic structures where power is in the shared hands of responsible companies and skilled, qualified users. Manifestos such as Wikinomics (Tapscott and Williams, 2006) and 'We-Think' (Leadbeater, 2007) argue collective culture to be the ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
113
0
11

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
113
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…There are very few legal hurdles to the exploitation of metadata reaped from (free) search, and most users are completely unaware of what the engine's metadata disclose about their identity or behaviour. Some of Google's engines, such as YouTube, offer end user licence agreements (eulas), which explicitly state that users allow the company to peruse metadata for all internal purposes or sell them to third parties in aggregated form (van Dijck and Nieborg, 2009). …”
Section: Individual and Collective Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are very few legal hurdles to the exploitation of metadata reaped from (free) search, and most users are completely unaware of what the engine's metadata disclose about their identity or behaviour. Some of Google's engines, such as YouTube, offer end user licence agreements (eulas), which explicitly state that users allow the company to peruse metadata for all internal purposes or sell them to third parties in aggregated form (van Dijck and Nieborg, 2009). …”
Section: Individual and Collective Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Különös, hogy hasonló arányokat kaptunk a fogyasztók gyakori megtévesztésénél a hagyományos boltok (3,39) és a webshopok (3,33) esetében. Ez azt jelenti, hogy a bolttípusok hitelessége között nem állapítható meg valós különbség.…”
Section: éLelmiszerfogyasztói Preferenciák Vizsgálata Különböző Vásárunclassified
“…A korzystanie z terminu "demokratyzacji" (ale i "amatorskiej pracy", "wspólnoty"), towarzyszących Web 2.0 jest na gruncie własnościowym elementem budowy użytecznego mitu 19 . Jak konstatuje T. Schaefer, wątki te sprowadzić można do sekwencji: "fajni ludzie fajnie z sobą współpracują, żeby stworzyć fajne rzeczy" -tak kreowane są pozytywne konotacje 20…”
Section: Crowdsourcing a Rynek Pracyunclassified