2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Widespread exposure of powerful owls to second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides in Australia spans an urban to agricultural and forest landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was also evident in recent research on powerful owls Ninox strenua 2 whereby extensive poisoning by SGARs was detected with 83% (15 of 18) of dead powerful owls tested showing detectable levels of SGARs in their livers. Some SGAR levels in powerful owls were likely lethal, and others would have caused significant toxicological impacts 2 …”
supporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was also evident in recent research on powerful owls Ninox strenua 2 whereby extensive poisoning by SGARs was detected with 83% (15 of 18) of dead powerful owls tested showing detectable levels of SGARs in their livers. Some SGAR levels in powerful owls were likely lethal, and others would have caused significant toxicological impacts 2 …”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Further to this, there is growing evidence that non‐target poisoning of non‐rodent species (e.g. possums) is leading to considerable leakage of these toxins into the wider predator community, i.e., non‐rodent hunters 2,3 . Secondary poisoning and non‐target poisoning of predators is documented extensively in the northern hemisphere 12 and is also now emerging as a significant issue in Australia with recent empirical evidence in southern boobooks Ninox boobook 1 and Tasmanian wedge‐tailed eagles Aquila audax fleayi 3 demonstrating high proportions of these species having SGARs in their livers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (the CMS, or Bonn Convention) highlighted secondary exposure to ARs as one of the most important toxicological hazards for migratory birds (CMS, 2014). The high acute toxicity and persistence of ARs in animal tissues, especially of SGARs, has led to their becoming ubiquitous in rodent-predator-scavenger food webs (López-Perea and Mateo, 2018;Pay et al, 2021;Elliott et al, 2022;Cooke et al, 2022). Baits containing ARs may be consumed by a number of non-target primary consumers (e. g., invertebrates, fish, wild birds and mammals), increasing the risk of exposure across the entire food web (Shore and Coeurdassier, 2018;Regnery et al, 2020;Alabau et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water sources and even the ecological environment can be contaminated by BDF via secondary poisoning of scavengers and other animals that enter the food chain (Rattner & Harvey, 2021; Regnery et al, 2019). BDF has been detected in powerful owls ( Ninox strenua ), suggesting that BDF has already contaminated the food chain of the nontargeted animals (Cooke et al, 2022). Another study showed the presence of BDF in the liver of birds, with the highest concentration of 7,809 ng/g in Norway (Walther, Geduhn, Schenke, & Jacob, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%