2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010 2010
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2010.5683988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wideband Sequential Spectrum Sensing with Varying Thresholds

Abstract: In this contribution, time varying threshold sequential detectors are employed for energy detection-based spectrum sensing in low-SNR regimes. Sequential detection is proven to be faster (on average) than any other multi-sample detector for a set of given probabilities of detection and false-alarm. In this report, exact performance of a sequential detector for spectrum sensing is analyzed using the direct method. The theoretical results presented herein are verified with Monte-Carlo simulations. It is shown th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a CR which can optimally incorporate all previous observations and thus decides for transmission within a short time is appealing. Sequential spectrum sensing has been proven to be on average faster than traditional energy detection [7], [15]- [17]. However, since detection time varies in sequential detection, it is not a good candidate for slotted CR strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a CR which can optimally incorporate all previous observations and thus decides for transmission within a short time is appealing. Sequential spectrum sensing has been proven to be on average faster than traditional energy detection [7], [15]- [17]. However, since detection time varies in sequential detection, it is not a good candidate for slotted CR strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence (21) can be rewritten as (23) The level-triggered sampling procedure at each secondary user is summarized in Algorithm 1. Until the fusion center terminates it, the algorithm produces the bit stream based on the local cumulative LLR values at time instants , and sends these bits to the fusion center instantaneously as they are generated.…”
Section: A Uniform Level-triggered Sampling At Each Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the current stage, we have intentionally limited the research to the ED case. In particular, we concentrated on its pragmatic and sequential version, called SEND (Sequential Energy Detection), implemented on USRP N210 boards in [6], [7]. The rationale behind this algorithm is as follows: the SEND algorithm stops working at the latest stage after the collection of N samples, as the traditional ED algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%