2015
DOI: 10.1117/12.2191359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wide-angle lens miniaturization through foveated imaging

Abstract: In the recent years, there have been many improvements in optics miniaturization, including wide-angle lenses. However, the design of a miniature wide-angle lens (FFOV 180°) is not a simple task. In order to correct aberrations that are issue from the large field of view, many lenses are necessary. Moreover, the amount of distortion is usually very high for those kinds of designs.It has been reported that distortion can be used as a design parameter in order to control the local magnification of the image acro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of optical design is highly compromised for wide-FOV systems if high foveal ratios are required (corresponding in this case to the ratio of the magnifications at the center and the periphery of the image) leading to a dramatic increase in optical complexity [2][3][4]. A related approach is to employ a lower-complexity wide-FOV optical design and only correct for aberrations over a small region of the FOV that can be programed dynamically using spatial-light modulators [12,13]; however, these solutions still require detectors with a very high pixel count.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This type of optical design is highly compromised for wide-FOV systems if high foveal ratios are required (corresponding in this case to the ratio of the magnifications at the center and the periphery of the image) leading to a dramatic increase in optical complexity [2][3][4]. A related approach is to employ a lower-complexity wide-FOV optical design and only correct for aberrations over a small region of the FOV that can be programed dynamically using spatial-light modulators [12,13]; however, these solutions still require detectors with a very high pixel count.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous strategies to achieve foveated sampling include: the use of non-uniform sensors (with variable photoreceptor density, mimicking the variable sampling rate of the retina) [1]; optical distortion for foveated lens design [2][3][4]; computational integration of independent imagers with dissimilar resolutions [5][6][7][8][9] and the use of a single sensor segmented into multiple channels with dissimilar magnifications [10]. The high cost of hardware and the added complexity of non-uniform sensors, or the optical complexity of foveal optics design, usually make these solutions unattractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tis technology can compensate for the problem of low spatial resolution caused by the limitation of the COMS pixels of the SRDA. Depending on their implementation, foveated imaging techniques can be divided into three major categories: local aberration-corrected foveated imaging [34][35][36][37], multichannel fused foveated imaging [38,39], and local magnifcation foveated imaging [40]. Local magnifcation foveal imaging technology realizes the local magnifcation of the region of interest through the foveated channel to improve the object space resolution of the system and can be widely coupled with diferent detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, specialized imaging sensors have been designed and applied to capture the scene with different resolutions. Examples are non-uniform sampling sensors [7], foveated optical distortion of the lens [8], and multiple-channel segmented single sensors [9]. Second, two or more cameras can be used and post-processed to generate a unified foveated image [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%