Why web 2.0 is good for learning and for research

Abstract

The term "Web 2.0" is used to describe applications that distinguish themselves from previous generations of software by a number of principles. Existing work shows that Web 2.0 applications can be successfully exploited for technologyenhance learning. However, in-depth analyses of the relationship between Web 2.0 technology on the one hand and teaching and learning on the other hand are still rare. In this article, we will analyze the technological principles of the Web 2.0 and describe their pedagogical implications on learning. We will furthermore show that Web 2.0 is not only well suited for learning but also for research on learning: the wealth of services that is available and their openness regarding API and data allow to assemble prototypes of technology-supported learning applications in amazingly small amount of time. These prototypes can be used to evaluate research hypotheses quickly. We will present two example prototypes and discuss the lessons we learned from building and using these prototypes.

Who Students Interact With? A Social Network Analysis Perspective on the Use of Twitter in Language Learning

“…Microblogging platforms have acquired a considerable attention of educational practitioners and researchers [1]. Twitter is one of the microblogging services that enable users to post brief messages and communicate with other users.…”

Making journal articles ‘live’: turning academic writing into scientific dialog

“…There are publications about the potential of Web 2.0 for research and education in academia (c.f. Boulos et al 2006;Greenhow et al 2009;Lankshear and Knobel 2007;Ullrich et al 2008). But, there are only a limited number of works that deal with 'live' paper-writing that fully consider the potential of Web 2.0 technologies (Stuart 2009) for spatial data sharing, editing, and analyzing to merge research and publication to revitalize scientific interactions.…”

A Comparison of Paper-Based and Online Annotations in the Workplace

“…Even though the annotations are still useful for personal use, they fail to play a role in the communicative and collaborative learning processes, which is a barrier for the leverage of learning by social constructivism [5]. Web 2.0 technologies explicitly facilitate these processes and their benefits on knowledge gathering and construction have been lately discussed [6]. Moreover, by exchange of documents, including annotations, remarks and insights, does not only serve the direct, contentrelated goals, but also contributes to motivation and enjoyable professional relationships [7].…”